R. v. Doonanco, 2020 SCC 2

JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 18, 2020
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2020 SCC 2
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 practice notes
  • R v Settle,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 14, 2021
    ...there is no risk of an injustice ....”. This likewise must fall into the scope of s 686(1)(a)(iii) CCC; · More recently in R v Doonanco, 2020 SCC 2 at para 4, 100 Alta LR (6th) 1, the issue was described as 4 Because Dr. Glancy’s report was not disclosed to the defence before Dr. Walker com......
  • R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 7, 2020
    ...61 at paras 3-4, [2014] AJ No 140 (QL); R v Jackson, 2013 ONCA 445 at paras 68-69, 308 CCC (3d) 66. [27] The Supreme Court in R v Doonanco, 2020 SCC 2, [2020] SCJ No 2 (QL) narrowed its conclusion on the inadmissibility of rebuttal evidence in that trial to unfair Crown conduct including by......
  • Borgel v Paintearth (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2020 ABCA 321
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 14, 2020
    ...2020 ABCA 136 at para 42, 8 Alta LR (7th) 292; R v Doonanco, 2019 ABCA 118 at para 142, 373 CCC (3d) 275, appeal allowed on other grounds 2020 SCC 2, 100 Alta LR (6th) 1. Of course, a court is not required to do so: R v Gollop (1980), 28 Nfld & PEIR 443 (NLCA); R v Cousins (1981) 32 Nfl......
  • R v Schreiner,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 7, 2023
    ...had disclosed his full assessment report and his conclusions to Mr. Schreiner prior to the trial. Unlike the circumstances in R v Doonanco, 2020 SCC 2, [2020] 1 SCR 9, trial fairness was not called into question in this case by the sequence of the witnesses' testimony, under the rule in Bro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • R v Settle,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • June 14, 2021
    ...there is no risk of an injustice ....”. This likewise must fall into the scope of s 686(1)(a)(iii) CCC; · More recently in R v Doonanco, 2020 SCC 2 at para 4, 100 Alta LR (6th) 1, the issue was described as 4 Because Dr. Glancy’s report was not disclosed to the defence before Dr. Walker com......
  • R v Poxleitner, 2020 ABCA 136
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 7, 2020
    ...61 at paras 3-4, [2014] AJ No 140 (QL); R v Jackson, 2013 ONCA 445 at paras 68-69, 308 CCC (3d) 66. [27] The Supreme Court in R v Doonanco, 2020 SCC 2, [2020] SCJ No 2 (QL) narrowed its conclusion on the inadmissibility of rebuttal evidence in that trial to unfair Crown conduct including by......
  • Borgel v Paintearth (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2020 ABCA 321
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 14, 2020
    ...2020 ABCA 136 at para 42, 8 Alta LR (7th) 292; R v Doonanco, 2019 ABCA 118 at para 142, 373 CCC (3d) 275, appeal allowed on other grounds 2020 SCC 2, 100 Alta LR (6th) 1. Of course, a court is not required to do so: R v Gollop (1980), 28 Nfld & PEIR 443 (NLCA); R v Cousins (1981) 32 Nfl......
  • R v BEM,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 4, 2022
    ...in Doonanco the Supreme Court reversed the decision of this Court and ordered a new trial on procedural fairness grounds: R v Doonanco, 2020 SCC 2 at paras 3-4, 100 Alta LR (6th) 1. In Suter the Supreme Court also allowed the appeal and altered the decision of this Court as to the ultimate ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT