R v Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Mr. Justice Christopher J. Mainella,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner,Madam Justice Lori T. Spivak |
| Citation | 2020 MBCA 23 |
| Date | 20 February 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Docket Number | AR19-30-09312 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R v Cormier,
...131; Dexter, at paras 20-21; SCDY at para 134; R v Werkman, 2007 ABCA 130 at para 9; Lyttle at para 65; RJM at paras 28-29; R v Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23 at para 21 If a trial judge finds there has been a breach of the rule in Browne v Dunn, there are various permissive options available in the ex......
-
Russell v. R.,
...(QL), Chandroo v. R., 2018 QCCA 1429, [2018] Q.J. No. 8321 (QL), R v. Willis, 2019 NSCA 64, [2019] N.S.J. No. 331 (QL), and R. v. Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23, [2020] M.J. No. 49 [33] As noted, a trial judge has a broad discretion in determining whether the rule in Browne v. Dunn is engaged and, if s......
-
R v Dowd,
...2019 MBCA 80). This Court allowed the accused’s summary conviction appeal, quashed his convictions and ordered a retrial (see 2020 MBCA 23). [3] &#......
-
R v Soroush et al,
...This Court has previously summarized the rule in R v Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23 (at para To ensure credibility assessments are made as a result of a fair and orderly trial process, the rule requires that, where a party intends to later impeach a witness on a matter of significance to the facts in i......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R v Cormier,
...131; Dexter, at paras 20-21; SCDY at para 134; R v Werkman, 2007 ABCA 130 at para 9; Lyttle at para 65; RJM at paras 28-29; R v Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23 at para 21 If a trial judge finds there has been a breach of the rule in Browne v Dunn, there are various permissive options available in the ex......
-
Russell v. R.,
...(QL), Chandroo v. R., 2018 QCCA 1429, [2018] Q.J. No. 8321 (QL), R v. Willis, 2019 NSCA 64, [2019] N.S.J. No. 331 (QL), and R. v. Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23, [2020] M.J. No. 49 [33] As noted, a trial judge has a broad discretion in determining whether the rule in Browne v. Dunn is engaged and, if s......
-
R v Soroush et al,
...This Court has previously summarized the rule in R v Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23 (at para To ensure credibility assessments are made as a result of a fair and orderly trial process, the rule requires that, where a party intends to later impeach a witness on a matter of significance to the facts in i......
-
R v Sutherland,
... [emphasis added] See also R v McDonald, 2017 MBCA 72 at paras 34-49; R v RV, 2019 SCC 41 at paras 83-98; and R v Dowd, 2020 MBCA 23 at paras [58] The Crown has a high burden of......
Request a trial to view additional results