R. v. Dubois, (1980) 23 A.R. 116 (SCC)
Judge | Martland, Dickson, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ. |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Case Date | June 20, 1980 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | (1980), 23 A.R. 116 (SCC);1980 CanLII 189 (SCC);[1980] SCJ No 38 (QL);[1980] 2 SCR 21;23 AR 116;[1980] ACS no 38;52 CCC (2d) 64 |
R. v. Dubois (1980), 23 A.R. 116 (SCC)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Dubois
Indexed As: R. v. Dubois
Supreme Court of Canada
Martland, Dickson, McIntyre, Chouinard and Lamer, JJ.
June 20, 1980.
Summary:
This case is an appeal from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal dated September 19, 1979 and reported at 17 A.R. 541.
This appeal was heard by MARTLAND, DICKSON, McINTYRE, CHOUINARD and LAMER, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada at Ottawa, Ontario.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered orally by MARTLAND, J., on June 20, 1980.
Counsel:
Bruce Duncan, for the appellant;
Lorne Scott, for the respondent.
This case is an appeal from a judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal dated September 19, 1979 and reported at 17 A.R. 541.
This appeal was heard by MARTLAND, DICKSON, McINTYRE, CHOUINARD and LAMER, JJ., of the Supreme Court of Canada at Ottawa, Ontario.
The judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada was delivered orally by MARTLAND, J., on June 20, 1980.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Richer (R.J.), (1993) 141 A.R. 116 (CA)
...[1965] 1 C.C.C. 210, affd. [1966] S.C.R. 254, refd to. [para. 29]. R. v. Dubois (1979), 17 A.R. 541; 49 C.C.C.(2d) 501 (C.A.), affd. [1980] 2 S.C.R. 21; 32 N.R. 176; 23 A.R. 116, refd to. [para. R. v. Jobidon, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 714; 128 N.R. 321; 49 O.A.C. 83; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 454, refd to. [par......
-
Mahjoub, Re, (2013) 457 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
...thing installed pursuant to a warrant issued under subsection 21(3) [...] 24. Notwithstanding any other law, a warrant issued under section 21 or 23 ( a ) authorizes every person or person included in a class of persons to whom the warrant is directed, (i) in the case of a warrant issued un......
-
D.R. v. A.A.K., (2006) 396 A.R. 33 (QB)
...in her brief entitled "Events and Timeline ..."): 1. January 15, 2001 - The mother learns she is pregnant (Exhibit 10, para. 10). 2. January 21 or 23, 2001 - Parties separate finally, after an initial separation around Christmas 2000 (Exhibit 6, para. 4 and 5). 3. September 4, 2001 - The fa......
-
Walton v. Alberta Securities Commission et al., (2014) 580 A.R. 218
...absence of any evidence to support that inference, or in situations where there is no "air of reality" to the inference: R. v. Dubois , [1980] 2 S.C.R. 21, adopting the dissenting reasons in (1979), 17 A.R. 541, 49 C.C.C. (2d) 501 at paras. 15-17 (C.A.); R. v. Morrissey (1995), 22 O.R. (3d)......
-
R. v. Richer (R.J.), (1993) 141 A.R. 116 (CA)
...[1965] 1 C.C.C. 210, affd. [1966] S.C.R. 254, refd to. [para. 29]. R. v. Dubois (1979), 17 A.R. 541; 49 C.C.C.(2d) 501 (C.A.), affd. [1980] 2 S.C.R. 21; 32 N.R. 176; 23 A.R. 116, refd to. [para. R. v. Jobidon, [1991] 2 S.C.R. 714; 128 N.R. 321; 49 O.A.C. 83; 66 C.C.C.(3d) 454, refd to. [par......
-
Mahjoub, Re, (2013) 457 F.T.R. 1 (FC)
...thing installed pursuant to a warrant issued under subsection 21(3) [...] 24. Notwithstanding any other law, a warrant issued under section 21 or 23 ( a ) authorizes every person or person included in a class of persons to whom the warrant is directed, (i) in the case of a warrant issued un......
-
D.R. v. A.A.K., (2006) 396 A.R. 33 (QB)
...in her brief entitled "Events and Timeline ..."): 1. January 15, 2001 - The mother learns she is pregnant (Exhibit 10, para. 10). 2. January 21 or 23, 2001 - Parties separate finally, after an initial separation around Christmas 2000 (Exhibit 6, para. 4 and 5). 3. September 4, 2001 - The fa......
-
Walton v. Alberta Securities Commission et al., (2014) 580 A.R. 218
...absence of any evidence to support that inference, or in situations where there is no "air of reality" to the inference: R. v. Dubois , [1980] 2 S.C.R. 21, adopting the dissenting reasons in (1979), 17 A.R. 541, 49 C.C.C. (2d) 501 at paras. 15-17 (C.A.); R. v. Morrissey (1995), 22 O.R. (3d)......