R. v. Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53
| Judge | Fitch; Smith; Willcock |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Case Date | February 14, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2019 BCCA 53 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
R. v. C.A.B.,
...the respondent submits that it is in the interests of justice to resolve the legal question that arises in this appeal: R. v. Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53, paras. 57-59; R. v. Poulin, 2019 SCC 47, paras. 16-27; R. v. E.O., 2019 YKCA 9, paras. 37-40. 7. &#......
-
R. v. Squires, 2020 NLSC 120
...2012 NLCA 2; R. v. Roberts, 2019 NLCA 43; R. v. Taylor (1997), 122 C.C.C. (3d) 376, 15 C.R. (5th) 48 (Sask. C.A.); R. v. Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53; R. v. Dunn, 2011 NBCA 19; Minot v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 NLCA 7 STATUTES CONSIDERED: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46; Real Esta......
-
R v Serafino,
...than rehabilitate the offender are not permitted (Shoker at para 13; R v Proulx, 2000 SCC 5 at para 32, [2000] 1 SCR 61; R v Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53 at para 61, 372 CCC (3d) [20] The residual power in s. 732.1(3)(h) permits a sentencing court to impose a probation term banishing an offender fr......
-
R. v. Picard, 2020 BCCA 107
...Code that appellate courts can and will decide questions that do not ultimately bear on guilt or innocence. Relying on R. v. Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53, and R. v. Rajaratnam, 2019 BCCA 209, the appellant submits we have a discretion to hear and decide questions that are moot where it is in the in......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
R. v. C.A.B.,
...the respondent submits that it is in the interests of justice to resolve the legal question that arises in this appeal: R. v. Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53, paras. 57-59; R. v. Poulin, 2019 SCC 47, paras. 16-27; R. v. E.O., 2019 YKCA 9, paras. 37-40. 7. &#......
-
R. v. Squires, 2020 NLSC 120
...2012 NLCA 2; R. v. Roberts, 2019 NLCA 43; R. v. Taylor (1997), 122 C.C.C. (3d) 376, 15 C.R. (5th) 48 (Sask. C.A.); R. v. Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53; R. v. Dunn, 2011 NBCA 19; Minot v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 NLCA 7 STATUTES CONSIDERED: Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46; Real Esta......
-
R v Serafino,
...than rehabilitate the offender are not permitted (Shoker at para 13; R v Proulx, 2000 SCC 5 at para 32, [2000] 1 SCR 61; R v Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53 at para 61, 372 CCC (3d) [20] The residual power in s. 732.1(3)(h) permits a sentencing court to impose a probation term banishing an offender fr......
-
R. v. Picard, 2020 BCCA 107
...Code that appellate courts can and will decide questions that do not ultimately bear on guilt or innocence. Relying on R. v. Duguay, 2019 BCCA 53, and R. v. Rajaratnam, 2019 BCCA 209, the appellant submits we have a discretion to hear and decide questions that are moot where it is in the in......
Request a trial to view additional results