R. v. Dunbar, Pollard, Leiding and Kravit,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFinch, C.J.B.C., Braidwood and Lowry, JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2003 BCCA 667
Citation2003 BCCA 667,(2003), 191 B.C.A.C. 223 (CA),191 BCAC 223,[2003] BCJ No 2767 (QL),[2003] B.C.J. No 2767 (QL),(2003), 191 BCAC 223 (CA),191 B.C.A.C. 223
Date09 December 2003
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
80 practice notes
  • R. v. Meer (J.D.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 17, 2015
    ...(B.S.) (2012), 326 B.C.A.C. 177; 554 W.A.C. 177; 295 C.C.C.(3d) 315; 2012 BCCA 340, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Dunbar (A.A.) et al. (2003), 191 B.C.A.C. 223; 314 W.A.C. 223; 2003 BCCA 667, leave to appeal refused (2004), 332 N.R. 396; 211 B.C.A.C. 320; 349 W.A.C. 320 (S.C.C.), refd to. [par......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...221, 68 CCC (2d) 13, [1982] OJ No 581 (CA) ................................................................ 190, 195, 409 R v Dunbar, 2003 BCCA 667, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2004] SCCA No 30 .................................................................27, 105, 135, 331 R v Duong......
  • Defending the Guilty
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...Criminal cases quoting Reid LJ’s comments with approval include R v Samra (1998), 129 CCC (3d) 144 at paras 64–65 (Ont CA); R v Dunbar , 2003 BCCA 667 at para 336; Felderhof , above note 40 at para 95; Lyttle , above note 44 at para 66. 53 See the cases ibid plus R v SGT , 2011 SKCA 4 at pa......
  • Decision Making
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...202 CCC (3d) 60 at para 139 (Ont CA) [ Archer ]; R v Eroma , 2013 ONCA 194 at para 8; GDB , above in this note at para 34; R v Dunbar , 2003 BCCA 667 at para 126 [ Dunbar ]; R v Brigham (1992), 79 CCC (3d) 365 at 380“f”–83“g” (Que CA) [ Brigham ]; R v Delisle (1999), 133 CCC (3d) 541 at 555......
  • Get Started for Free
73 cases
  • R. v. Meer (J.D.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • April 17, 2015
    ...(B.S.) (2012), 326 B.C.A.C. 177; 554 W.A.C. 177; 295 C.C.C.(3d) 315; 2012 BCCA 340, refd to. [para. 14]. R. v. Dunbar (A.A.) et al. (2003), 191 B.C.A.C. 223; 314 W.A.C. 223; 2003 BCCA 667, leave to appeal refused (2004), 332 N.R. 396; 211 B.C.A.C. 320; 349 W.A.C. 320 (S.C.C.), refd to. [par......
  • R v Herntier
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • October 6, 2020
    ...at paras 77-78; Shulman, at paras 44-45; R v W(W) (1995), 100 CCC (3d) 225 at 233 (Ont CA); and R v Dunbar, Pollard, Leiding and Kravit, 2003 BCCA 667 at paras 35-37.) In Richard, Cameron JA, for the Court, considered whether the fresh evidence was “sufficient to undermine the reliability o......
  • Gligorevic v. McMaster et al.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • November 1, 2011
    ...99 O.A.C. 1; 32 O.R.(3d) 722 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 68]. K.G.F., Re, 306 Mont. 1, dist. [para. 75]. R. v. Dunbar (A.A.) et al. (2003), 191 B.C.A.C. 223; 314 W.A.C. 223; 2003 BCCA 667, refd to. [para. R. v. Imona-Russell - see R. v. Russell (W.I.). R. v. Russel (W.I.) (2011), 277 O.A.C. 264......
  • Groia v. Law Society of Upper Canada
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • June 14, 2016
    ...That option was open to them. That is what the British Columbia Court of Appeal did in R. v. Dunbar, Pollard, Leiding and Kravit , 2003 BCCA 667, 191 B.C.A.C. 223. But that is not what the courts did in this case. A public shaming was administered; directions for the remainder of the trial ......
  • Get Started for Free
6 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...221, 68 CCC (2d) 13, [1982] OJ No 581 (CA) ................................................................ 190, 195, 409 R v Dunbar, 2003 BCCA 667, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2004] SCCA No 30 .................................................................27, 105, 135, 331 R v Duong......
  • Defending the Guilty
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...Criminal cases quoting Reid LJ’s comments with approval include R v Samra (1998), 129 CCC (3d) 144 at paras 64–65 (Ont CA); R v Dunbar , 2003 BCCA 667 at para 336; Felderhof , above note 40 at para 95; Lyttle , above note 44 at para 66. 53 See the cases ibid plus R v SGT , 2011 SKCA 4 at pa......
  • Decision Making
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...202 CCC (3d) 60 at para 139 (Ont CA) [ Archer ]; R v Eroma , 2013 ONCA 194 at para 8; GDB , above in this note at para 34; R v Dunbar , 2003 BCCA 667 at para 126 [ Dunbar ]; R v Brigham (1992), 79 CCC (3d) 365 at 380“f”–83“g” (Que CA) [ Brigham ]; R v Delisle (1999), 133 CCC (3d) 541 at 555......
  • Client Perjury
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...CCC (3d) 365 at 380–83 and 390–91 (Que CA) [ Brigham ]; R v Smith (1997), 120 CCC (3d) 500 at paras 14–15 and 26 (Ont CA); R v Dunbar , 2003 BCCA 667 at para 126, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2004] SCCA No 30; Qiu , above note 5 at para 15. 10 See Section F(4)(b), below in this chapter.......
  • Get Started for Free