R v Dyck,

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson,The Honourable Madam Justice Elizabeth Hughes,The Honourable Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan
Neutral Citation2020 ABCA 412
Docket Number1903-0173-A
Citation2020 ABCA 412
Date19 November 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Dichrow,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 2, 2022
    ...and then also relied upon as an aggravating factor in sentencing of another offence or generally to support a higher sentence: R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412 [Dyck] at para 33. In this case, the sentencing judge is said to have identified aggravating factors when sentencing on the sexual assault/s......
  • R v Byron,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 8, 2021
    ...offences, committed two months apart, in two different locations, with two different victims impacted by the explosion: R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412 [Dyck] at paras 25 - 29. [143] He will serve 6.5 years on each of Counts 4, 5, and 6: robbery with a firearm, aggravated assault, and causing an ex......
  • R v Shivak,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 20, 2023
    ...is excessive, it may be reduced through the application of the totality principle: Sentencing Reasons at para 85 citing R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412, R v Bedi, 2015 ABCA 361; and R v Swales, 2016 BCCA 7 While there is no single “Alberta approach” requiring the use of consecutive se......
  • 2023 ABCA 20,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...is excessive, it may be reduced through the application of the totality principle: Sentencing Reasons at para 85 citing R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412, R v Bedi, 2015 ABCA 361; and R v Swales, 2016 BCCA 7 While there is no single “Alberta approach” requiring the use of consecutive se......
4 cases
  • R v Dichrow,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 2, 2022
    ...and then also relied upon as an aggravating factor in sentencing of another offence or generally to support a higher sentence: R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412 [Dyck] at para 33. In this case, the sentencing judge is said to have identified aggravating factors when sentencing on the sexual assault/s......
  • R v Byron,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 8, 2021
    ...offences, committed two months apart, in two different locations, with two different victims impacted by the explosion: R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412 [Dyck] at paras 25 - 29. [143] He will serve 6.5 years on each of Counts 4, 5, and 6: robbery with a firearm, aggravated assault, and causing an ex......
  • R v Shivak,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 20, 2023
    ...is excessive, it may be reduced through the application of the totality principle: Sentencing Reasons at para 85 citing R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412, R v Bedi, 2015 ABCA 361; and R v Swales, 2016 BCCA 7 While there is no single “Alberta approach” requiring the use of consecutive se......
  • 2023 ABCA 20,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...is excessive, it may be reduced through the application of the totality principle: Sentencing Reasons at para 85 citing R v Dyck, 2020 ABCA 412, R v Bedi, 2015 ABCA 361; and R v Swales, 2016 BCCA 7 While there is no single “Alberta approach” requiring the use of consecutive se......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT