R. v. Edwards
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Richard Wagner; Andromache Karakatsanis; Suzanne Côté; Malcolm Rowe; Nicholas Kasirer; Mahmud Jamal; Michelle O’Bonsawin |
| Judgment Date | 26 April 2024 |
| Citation | 2024 SCC 15 |
| Docket Number | 39820; 39822; 40046; 40065; 40103 |
| Date | 26 April 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Saskatchewan (Minister of Education) v. UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity
...has recognized these important institutional differences between legislatures and the judiciary. (Emphasis added) See also R v Edwards, 2024 SCC 15 at para 80, per Kasirer J. for the [257] In Vriend, Iacobucci J. (for himself and Cory J.) wrote: [136] Because the courts are independent from......
-
Wesley v. Alberta
...defences in Aboriginal rights claims, but such recommendations do not necessarily reflect constitutional or legal standards: R. v Edwards, 2024 SCC 15 at paras. 73-77, 492 DLR (4th) 1. In response to this unicentric approach, the Attorney General of Canada has developed and published a Dire......
-
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Saskatchewan (Attorney General)
...R. v. Sullivan, 2022 SCC 19, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 460; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833; R. v. Edwards, 2024 SCC 15; Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26; Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. ......
-
R. v. Qita
...a presumption that is not easily displaced: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, at para. 59; R. v. Edwards, 2024 SCC 15, 436 C.C.C. (3d) 1, at para. 84; and R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, at paras. 32, [33] The pr......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Saskatchewan (Minister of Education) v. UR Pride Centre for Sexuality and Gender Diversity
...has recognized these important institutional differences between legislatures and the judiciary. (Emphasis added) See also R v Edwards, 2024 SCC 15 at para 80, per Kasirer J. for the [257] In Vriend, Iacobucci J. (for himself and Cory J.) wrote: [136] Because the courts are independent from......
-
Wesley v. Alberta
...defences in Aboriginal rights claims, but such recommendations do not necessarily reflect constitutional or legal standards: R. v Edwards, 2024 SCC 15 at paras. 73-77, 492 DLR (4th) 1. In response to this unicentric approach, the Attorney General of Canada has developed and published a Dire......
-
John Howard Society of Saskatchewan v. Saskatchewan (Attorney General)
...R. v. Sullivan, 2022 SCC 19, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 460; R. v. Chaulk, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 1303; R. v. Bernard, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 833; R. v. Edwards, 2024 SCC 15; Canada (Attorney General) v. Power, 2024 SCC 26; Clark v. Canadian National Railway Co., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680; R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. ......
-
R. v. Qita
...a presumption that is not easily displaced: Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, at para. 59; R. v. Edwards, 2024 SCC 15, 436 C.C.C. (3d) 1, at para. 84; and R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484, at paras. 32, [33] The pr......
Get Started for Free
