R. v. Emery

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Ker
Citation2019 BCSC 1710
Docket Number67604-2
Date06 June 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Emery
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 13, 2019
    ...from the Supreme Court of Canada decisions in R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32 and R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34 . My reasons are indexed at 2019 BCSC 1710. [7] On June 20, 2019, Mr. Emery appeared before the court and changed his pleas, entering guilty pleas to counts 2 through 4 on the indictmen......
  • R. v. Cade, Ceal, and Whaling
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 24, 2022
    ...that four references in the ITO to past police suspicions and involvements with him are prejudicial and irrelevant, citing R. v. Emery, 2019 BCSC 1710 at paras 29-34. [104]    It is not in itself offensive for an ITO to refer to the suspect’s past police involvement or......
  • R. v. Abo Zead
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2020
    ...Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada at para. 22…. [50]        The defence relies on R. v. Emery, 2019 BCSC 1710 at para. 36, which quotes from an earlier ruling in Ferguson: 2018 BCSC 378 at paras 65–70. That ruling addressed the accused’s facial......
3 cases
  • R. v. Cade, Ceal, and Whaling
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 24, 2022
    ...that four references in the ITO to past police suspicions and involvements with him are prejudicial and irrelevant, citing R. v. Emery, 2019 BCSC 1710 at paras 29-34. [104] It is not in itself offensive for an ITO to refer to the suspect’s past police involvement or past investigations: see......
  • R. v. Emery
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 13, 2019
    ...from the Supreme Court of Canada decisions in R. v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32 and R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34 . My reasons are indexed at 2019 BCSC 1710. [7] On June 20, 2019, Mr. Emery appeared before the court and changed his pleas, entering guilty pleas to counts 2 through 4 on the indictmen......
  • R. v. Abo Zead
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 10, 2020
    ...to criminal liability” for the named offences: CanadianOxy Chemicals Ltd. v. Canada at para. 22…. [50] The defence relies on R. v. Emery, 2019 BCSC 1710 at para. 36, which quotes from an earlier ruling in Ferguson: 2018 BCSC 378 at paras 65–70. That ruling addressed the accused’s facial cha......