R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Judge Jenkins |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 06, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2018 BCSC 1138 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. Lai,
...a discrete, exceptional circumstance, “risks imposing a form of ‘double punishment’ on an accused”. The appellant cites R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138 where the court (at para. 75) recognized that an accused should not in that manner be “doubly penalized” for the [28] The appellant also rel......
-
R. v. Virk, 2019 BCSC 1271
...of showing that delay was caused solely by the conduct of defence: R. v. Curry, 2016 BCSC 1435 at paras. 121,140; R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138 at paras. 66-72 [49] If the net total exceeds the presumptive 30‑month ceiling, the onu......
-
R. v. Sharma,
...in Provincial Court to trial in Supreme Court is accounted for in the 30-month ceiling for trials in superior court: R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138 at para. 75; R. v. Nasery, 2017 ABQB 564 at para. 60. [28] In R. v. Lai, 2021 BCCA 105 at para.&#......
-
R. v. A.B.,
...argues that the applicant is entitled to re-elect pursuant to s. 461(2) of the Code. As noted by Justice Jenkins in R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138, at paras. 66 to 75, the Jordan time limits already provide for an increase in the time limit by 12 months upon re-election. [97] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R. v. Lai,
...a discrete, exceptional circumstance, “risks imposing a form of ‘double punishment’ on an accused”. The appellant cites R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138 where the court (at para. 75) recognized that an accused should not in that manner be “doubly penalized” for the [28] The appellant also rel......
-
R. v. Virk, 2019 BCSC 1271
...of showing that delay was caused solely by the conduct of defence: R. v. Curry, 2016 BCSC 1435 at paras. 121,140; R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138 at paras. 66-72 [49] If the net total exceeds the presumptive 30‑month ceiling, the onu......
-
R. v. Sharma,
...in Provincial Court to trial in Supreme Court is accounted for in the 30-month ceiling for trials in superior court: R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138 at para. 75; R. v. Nasery, 2017 ABQB 564 at para. 60. [28] In R. v. Lai, 2021 BCCA 105 at para.&#......
-
R. v. A.B.,
...argues that the applicant is entitled to re-elect pursuant to s. 461(2) of the Code. As noted by Justice Jenkins in R. v. Eremenko, 2018 BCSC 1138, at paras. 66 to 75, the Jordan time limits already provide for an increase in the time limit by 12 months upon re-election. [97] ......
Request a trial to view additional results