R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7
| Judge | Oland |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 08, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Citations | 2019 NSCA 7 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
R. v. Butcher, 2020 NSCA 50
...(C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500 at para. 90; R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6 at para. 46; R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at para. 43-44 and para. 49. [2019 NSCA 7] … [830] As stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [52] It is possible for a sentence to be demonstrably unfit even if the judge ha......
-
R. v. Laing,
...2 S.C.R. 496, paras. 23-24; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9, para. 26; R. v. Parranto, 2021 SCC 46, paras. 13-15; R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7, para. 34; R. v. Newman, 2020 NSCA 24, para. 31; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, paras. 20-24; R. v. Alcorn, 2021 NSCA 75, paras. 25-27; R. v. Probe......
-
R. v. Hynes,
...consideration of an aggravating or mitigating factor” (R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9, at para. 26; R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7, at para. 34). See also: R. v. Laing, 2022 NSCA 23 [18] This standard of review and limited role for ......
-
R. v. Dimock,
...inclined to engage in similar criminal activity. This case was cited with approval by our Court of Appeal in R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7. [61] In R. v. Bryan, 2008 NSCA 119, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal addressed the primacy of deterrence and den......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
R. v. Butcher, 2020 NSCA 50
...(C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500 at para. 90; R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6 at para. 46; R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at para. 43-44 and para. 49. [2019 NSCA 7] … [830] As stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [52] It is possible for a sentence to be demonstrably unfit even if the judge ha......
-
R. v. Laing,
...2 S.C.R. 496, paras. 23-24; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9, para. 26; R. v. Parranto, 2021 SCC 46, paras. 13-15; R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7, para. 34; R. v. Newman, 2020 NSCA 24, para. 31; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, paras. 20-24; R. v. Alcorn, 2021 NSCA 75, paras. 25-27; R. v. Probe......
-
R. v. Hynes,
...consideration of an aggravating or mitigating factor” (R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9, at para. 26; R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7, at para. 34). See also: R. v. Laing, 2022 NSCA 23 [18] This standard of review and limited role for ......
-
R. v. Dimock,
...inclined to engage in similar criminal activity. This case was cited with approval by our Court of Appeal in R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7. [61] In R. v. Bryan, 2008 NSCA 119, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal addressed the primacy of deterrence and den......
Request a trial to view additional results