R. v. Esseghaier
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Judge | Fairburn A.C.J.O., Doherty and Trotter JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ONCA 162 |
| Citation | 2021 ONCA 162 |
| Date | 12 March 2021 |
| Docket Number | M51969 (C61095 & C61185) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 14-18, 2025)
...1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), Korman v. Korman, 2015 ONCA 578, Bak v. Dobell, 2007 ONCA 304, Colucci v. Colucci, 2021 SCC 24, R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 ONCA 162, Director, Family Responsibility Office v. Janic, 2022 ONSC 3848 Mullin v. Sherlock, 2025 ONCA 510 Keywords: Family Law, Property, Equaliza......
-
R v Jaser
...trial record. After various case management hearings and a proceeding before the panel dealing with a production request ( R. v. Jaser, 2021 ONCA 162, 403 C.C.C. (3d) 421), the parties were able to reach an agreed statement of facts (“ASF”) setting out the circumstances relevant to the reas......
-
R. v. Cowan
...the appellant in making a full answer and defence: see e.g., R. v. Curragh Inc., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 537, at para. 63; R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 ONCA 162, at para. 26. The Crown’s agreement not to appear before the trial judge and his attempts to have the file reassigned indicate a real ris......
-
Janic v Janic
...person, viewing the matter realistically and practically – and having thought the matter through – [would] conclude’”: R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 ONCA 162, 403 C.C.C. (3d) 421, at para. 19 (citations omitted). We do not see how this strict test could be satisfied in the (4) Issue 4: Conflict wi......
3 cases
-
R v Jaser
...trial record. After various case management hearings and a proceeding before the panel dealing with a production request ( R. v. Jaser, 2021 ONCA 162, 403 C.C.C. (3d) 421), the parties were able to reach an agreed statement of facts (“ASF”) setting out the circumstances relevant to the reas......
-
R. v. Cowan
...the appellant in making a full answer and defence: see e.g., R. v. Curragh Inc., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 537, at para. 63; R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 ONCA 162, at para. 26. The Crown’s agreement not to appear before the trial judge and his attempts to have the file reassigned indicate a real ris......
-
Janic v Janic
...person, viewing the matter realistically and practically – and having thought the matter through – [would] conclude’”: R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 ONCA 162, 403 C.C.C. (3d) 421, at para. 19 (citations omitted). We do not see how this strict test could be satisfied in the (4) Issue 4: Conflict wi......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 14-18, 2025)
...1985, c. 1 (5th Supp.), Korman v. Korman, 2015 ONCA 578, Bak v. Dobell, 2007 ONCA 304, Colucci v. Colucci, 2021 SCC 24, R. v. Esseghaier, 2021 ONCA 162, Director, Family Responsibility Office v. Janic, 2022 ONSC 3848 Mullin v. Sherlock, 2025 ONCA 510 Keywords: Family Law, Property, Equaliza......