R. v. Evaloakjuk (L.), [2001] A.R. Uned. 497

JudgeVertes, J.A.
CourtNunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
Case DateMarch 26, 2001
JurisdictionNunavut
Citations[2001] A.R. Uned. 497;[2001] A.R. Uned. 497 (NUCA);2001 NUCA 1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. Smeltzer,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...was planned and deliberate: see e.g. R v Hall, 2021 ONSC 28 at paras 318-9; R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at paras 33-34; R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1 at para 18. Otherwise, as noted by some of these authorities, where there was evidence of a motive and an opportunity to plan, “virtual......
  • R. v. Hall, 2021 ONSC 28
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 5, 2021
    ...R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 33-34, citing with approval the decision of the Nunavut Court of Appeal, R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1: Evidence that the applicant was angry or felt animosity towards Mr. Green and Mr. Mohammed may be evidence of motive but not, in my view, of plan......
  • R. v. Smeltzer,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...was planned and deliberate: see e.g. R v Hall, 2021 ONSC 28 at paras 318-9; R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at paras 33-34; R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1 at para 18. Otherwise, as noted by some of the authorities, where there was evidence of a motive and an opportunity to plan, “virtually......
3 cases
  • R. v. Smeltzer,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...was planned and deliberate: see e.g. R v Hall, 2021 ONSC 28 at paras 318-9; R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at paras 33-34; R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1 at para 18. Otherwise, as noted by some of these authorities, where there was evidence of a motive and an opportunity to plan, “virtual......
  • R. v. Hall, 2021 ONSC 28
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 5, 2021
    ...R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 33-34, citing with approval the decision of the Nunavut Court of Appeal, R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1: Evidence that the applicant was angry or felt animosity towards Mr. Green and Mr. Mohammed may be evidence of motive but not, in my view, of plan......
  • R. v. Smeltzer,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 16, 2021
    ...was planned and deliberate: see e.g. R v Hall, 2021 ONSC 28 at paras 318-9; R v McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006 at paras 33-34; R v Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1 at para 18. Otherwise, as noted by some of the authorities, where there was evidence of a motive and an opportunity to plan, “virtually......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT