R. v. Evaloakjuk (L.),

JurisdictionNunavut
JudgeVertes, J.A.
Neutral Citation2001 NUCA 1
Citation[2001] A.R. Uned. 497,[2001] A.R. Uned. 497 (NUCA),2001 NUCA 1,[2001] AR Uned 497,[2001] AR Uned 497 (NUCA)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE
Date26 March 2001
CourtNunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • R. v. Singh,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 15, 2022
    ...of Appeal that stated evidence of motive, standing alone, cannot support an inference of planning and deliberation: R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1, at para. 18, cited with approval by R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 32-34. However, the weight of authority is that evidence of motive......
1 cases
  • R. v. Singh,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 15, 2022
    ...of Appeal that stated evidence of motive, standing alone, cannot support an inference of planning and deliberation: R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1, at para. 18, cited with approval by R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 32-34. However, the weight of authority is that evidence of motive......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT