R. v. Evaloakjuk (L.),
Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
Judge | Vertes, J.A. |
Neutral Citation | 2001 NUCA 1 |
Citation | [2001] A.R. Uned. 497,[2001] A.R. Uned. 497 (NUCA),2001 NUCA 1,[2001] AR Uned 497,[2001] AR Uned 497 (NUCA) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE |
Date | 26 March 2001 |
Court | Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
R. v. Singh,
...of Appeal that stated evidence of motive, standing alone, cannot support an inference of planning and deliberation: R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1, at para. 18, cited with approval by R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 32-34. However, the weight of authority is that evidence of motive......
1 cases
-
R. v. Singh,
...of Appeal that stated evidence of motive, standing alone, cannot support an inference of planning and deliberation: R. v. Evaloakjuk, 2001 NUCA 1, at para. 18, cited with approval by R. v. McKenzie, 2018 ONSC 2006, at paras. 32-34. However, the weight of authority is that evidence of motive......