R. v. Eyre, 2019 BCCA 333
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Frankel,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon |
Citation | 2019 BCCA 333 |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Date | 04 October 2019 |
Docket Number | CA45421 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65
...of causing serious bodily harm, i.e., by shooting a projectile with a muzzle velocity sufficient to injure a human eye: R. v. Eyre, 2019 BCCA 333 at paras. [24] The definition of “firearm” also captures weapons that are incapable of discharging a projectile but which can readily be made ope......
-
R. v. Koivumaki,
...simply because they are guilty of a different crime, even if that different crime is more serious than the one alleged. In R. v. Eyre, 2019 BCCA 333, for example, the accused’s conviction on a charge of possession of a replica firearm was overturned on the basis that the object he po......
2 cases
-
R. v. Robertson, 2020 BCCA 65
...of causing serious bodily harm, i.e., by shooting a projectile with a muzzle velocity sufficient to injure a human eye: R. v. Eyre, 2019 BCCA 333 at paras. [24] The definition of “firearm” also captures weapons that are incapable of discharging a projectile but which can readily be made ope......
-
R. v. Koivumaki,
...simply because they are guilty of a different crime, even if that different crime is more serious than the one alleged. In R. v. Eyre, 2019 BCCA 333, for example, the accused’s conviction on a charge of possession of a replica firearm was overturned on the basis that the object he po......