R. v. Fead, 2017 ABCA 222

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Ronald Berger,The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Sheila Greckol
Citation2017 ABCA 222
Docket Number1603-0299-A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date27 July 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v. MacIntosh, 2018 NSPC 45
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 22 Noviembre 2018
    ...not be appropriate for the court to consider anything above that boundary without giving the parties a chance to respond: R. v. Fead, 2017 ABCA 222 at para. 5; R. v. Abel, 2011 NWTCA 4 at para. 23; R. v. Burback, 2012 ABCA 30 at paras. 13-14; R. v. Scott, 2016 NLCA 16 at para. 26; R. v. Hag......
  • R v Joyce,
    • Canada
    • 3 Agosto 2022
    ...I must be cautious in relying on findings of fact regarding drug risks made by other courts in other cases. For instance, in R v Fead, 2017 ABCA 222 at ¶ 15 and 24, a sentencing judge was found to have relied erroneously on expert testimony given in another case about the potency of me......
  • R v TB,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 25 Enero 2021
    ...but it is highly desirable for a judge to alert counsel if he or she proposes to sentence outside the suggested range: R. v Fead, 2017 ABCA 222 at paras. 5-6, 21, 57 Alta LR (6th) 258; R. v Burback, 2012 ABCA 30, 68 Alta LR (5th) 72, 522 AR 352; R. v Hood, 2011 ABCA 169 at paras. 14-5, 505 ......
3 cases
  • R. v. MacIntosh, 2018 NSPC 45
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 22 Noviembre 2018
    ...not be appropriate for the court to consider anything above that boundary without giving the parties a chance to respond: R. v. Fead, 2017 ABCA 222 at para. 5; R. v. Abel, 2011 NWTCA 4 at para. 23; R. v. Burback, 2012 ABCA 30 at paras. 13-14; R. v. Scott, 2016 NLCA 16 at para. 26; R. v. Hag......
  • R v Joyce,
    • Canada
    • 3 Agosto 2022
    ...I must be cautious in relying on findings of fact regarding drug risks made by other courts in other cases. For instance, in R v Fead, 2017 ABCA 222 at ¶ 15 and 24, a sentencing judge was found to have relied erroneously on expert testimony given in another case about the potency of me......
  • R v TB,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 25 Enero 2021
    ...but it is highly desirable for a judge to alert counsel if he or she proposes to sentence outside the suggested range: R. v Fead, 2017 ABCA 222 at paras. 5-6, 21, 57 Alta LR (6th) 258; R. v Burback, 2012 ABCA 30, 68 Alta LR (5th) 72, 522 AR 352; R. v Hood, 2011 ABCA 169 at paras. 14-5, 505 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT