R. v. Fedyck, 2019 SCC 3
| Judge | Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Case Date | January 16, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
| Citations | 2019 SCC 3 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
R v Osman,
...to substitute other reasonable inferences for those found by the trial judge: R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, paras 21-33, 365 CCC (3d) 20, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, [2019] 1 SCR 97; R v Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, para 166, [2019] 1 WWR 612; Cabrera, paras 166-168. It is clear here that the trial judge paid cl......
-
R. v. Goodman,
...p. 362; R v Seaboyer, [1991] 2 SCR 577 at p. 603; R v AWE, [1993] 3 SCR 155 at p.198; R v Mills, [1999] 3 SCR 668 at para. 94; R v Barton, 2019 SCC 3 at para. 210, R v Goldfinch, 2019 SCC 38 at paras. [13] Moreover, as Justice Arnold stated in R v Garnier, 2017 NSSC 341 at para. 76, ......
-
R v Perswain,
...33-37; R v Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780 at paras 24-31; R v Ponace, 2019 MBCA 99 at paras 17-19; and R v Fedyk, 2018 MBCA 74 at para 25, aff’d 2019 SCC 3.) [10] The accused argues that the unreasonable verdict is the result of erroneous factual findings and/or factual inferences. His position is......
-
R v Sutherland,
...With respect to the second ground of appeal, this Court, in R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, when addressing the admissibility of lay opinion evidence, stated that, “[a]s a question of law, a decision on the admission of evidence is reviewed on the standar......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
R v Osman,
...to substitute other reasonable inferences for those found by the trial judge: R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, paras 21-33, 365 CCC (3d) 20, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, [2019] 1 SCR 97; R v Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, para 166, [2019] 1 WWR 612; Cabrera, paras 166-168. It is clear here that the trial judge paid cl......
-
R. v. Goodman,
...p. 362; R v Seaboyer, [1991] 2 SCR 577 at p. 603; R v AWE, [1993] 3 SCR 155 at p.198; R v Mills, [1999] 3 SCR 668 at para. 94; R v Barton, 2019 SCC 3 at para. 210, R v Goldfinch, 2019 SCC 38 at paras. [13] Moreover, as Justice Arnold stated in R v Garnier, 2017 NSSC 341 at para. 76, ......
-
R v Perswain,
...33-37; R v Anderson, 2020 ONCA 780 at paras 24-31; R v Ponace, 2019 MBCA 99 at paras 17-19; and R v Fedyk, 2018 MBCA 74 at para 25, aff’d 2019 SCC 3.) [10] The accused argues that the unreasonable verdict is the result of erroneous factual findings and/or factual inferences. His position is......
-
R v Sutherland,
...With respect to the second ground of appeal, this Court, in R v Fedyck, 2018 MBCA 74, aff’d 2019 SCC 3, when addressing the admissibility of lay opinion evidence, stated that, “[a]s a question of law, a decision on the admission of evidence is reviewed on the standar......
Request a trial to view additional results