R. v. Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266

JudgeJudge A.A. Fradsham
Citation2017 ABPC 266
Date02 November 2017
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number040878977P1
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v. Hunt, 2018 NLSC 170
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • August 20, 2018
    ...v. Picard, 2016 ONSC 7061; R. v. Bowers, 2017 NSPC 21; R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880; R. c. Gakmakge, 2017 QCCS 3279; R. v. Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266; R. v. Ny, 2016 ONSC 8031; R. v. Lemioer, 2017 SKQB 106; R. v. Vassell, 2016 SCC 26; R. v. La, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 680; R. v. Picard, 2017 ONCA 6......
  • R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 30, 2019
    ...that the time it took to complete the original trial was unreasonable (see R v Gakmakge, 2017 QCCS 3279 at para 41; R v Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266 at para 48). [38] I also agree with the Ontario Court of Appeal in MacIsaac that retrials should be prioritized and ordinarily be conducted in signif......
  • R. v. Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 283
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 16, 2017
    ...has had a tortured history, and details of it are more particularly set out in my earlier section 11(b) Charter ruling (R. v. Ferstl 2017 ABPC 266). Suffice it to say that the matter went to trial in 2005 and Mr. Ferstl was acquitted when the learned trial judge found a section 10(b) Charte......
  • R v Crowchild, 2018 ABQB 368
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 4, 2018
    ...time taken in respect of each trial as well as assessing the overall time, in concluding the delay was reasonable. [26] In R v Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court considered a section 11(b) application involving a retrial. He was mindful that the accused ha......
4 cases
  • R v. Hunt, 2018 NLSC 170
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • August 20, 2018
    ...v. Picard, 2016 ONSC 7061; R. v. Bowers, 2017 NSPC 21; R. v. Potvin, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 880; R. c. Gakmakge, 2017 QCCS 3279; R. v. Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266; R. v. Ny, 2016 ONSC 8031; R. v. Lemioer, 2017 SKQB 106; R. v. Vassell, 2016 SCC 26; R. v. La, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 680; R. v. Picard, 2017 ONCA 6......
  • R v JEV, 2019 ABCA 359
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 30, 2019
    ...that the time it took to complete the original trial was unreasonable (see R v Gakmakge, 2017 QCCS 3279 at para 41; R v Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266 at para 48). [38] I also agree with the Ontario Court of Appeal in MacIsaac that retrials should be prioritized and ordinarily be conducted in signif......
  • R. v. Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 283
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 16, 2017
    ...has had a tortured history, and details of it are more particularly set out in my earlier section 11(b) Charter ruling (R. v. Ferstl 2017 ABPC 266). Suffice it to say that the matter went to trial in 2005 and Mr. Ferstl was acquitted when the learned trial judge found a section 10(b) Charte......
  • R v Crowchild, 2018 ABQB 368
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 4, 2018
    ...time taken in respect of each trial as well as assessing the overall time, in concluding the delay was reasonable. [26] In R v Ferstl, 2017 ABPC 266, Judge Fradsham of the Alberta Provincial Court considered a section 11(b) application involving a retrial. He was mindful that the accused ha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT