R. v. Finck, 2019 NSCA 60

JurisdictionNova Scotia
JudgeBeveridge, Oland and Farrar, JJ.A.
Date18 June 2019
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Docket NumberCAC 474209
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Travers, 2019 NSCA 83
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 7 Noviembre 2019
    ...2015 SCC 64; R. v. Senek (1998), 130 C.C.C. (3d) 473 (Man. C.A.); R. v. Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8; R. v. Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58; R. v. Finck, 2019 NSCA 60; R. v. Snow, 2019 NSCA 76; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759   Summary: The appellant sought to have his conviction overturned on......
  • R. v. Murphy,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 30 Marzo 2022
    ...2011 NSCA 105, at para. 29; R. v. Fraser, 2011 NSCA 70, at para. 53; R. v. Ross, 2012 NSCA 56; R. v. Buckley, 2013 NSCA 73; R. v. Finck, 2019 NSCA 60; R. v. A.W.H., 2019 NSCA 40, at [78]      The appellant complains trial counsel’s incompetent representation ......
  • R. v. Snow, 2019 NSCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 12 Septiembre 2019
    ...R. v. Ross, 2012 NSCA 56 at para. 51; R. v. Moore, 2002 SKCA 30 at paras. 46-47, 51; R. v. A.W.H., 2019 NSCA 40 at para. 40; R. v. Finck, 2019 NSCA 60 at para. [35] With these principles in mind, I turn to their application in these circumstances. Application of the principles [36] Initiall......
  • R. v. Bussière, 2020 ABPC 2
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 3 Enero 2020
    ...at 48) It is essential that the decision be a properly informed one, based on the advice of counsel, when that is available. (R v Finck, 2019 NSCA 60 at 54)  [30]           In this case, there was effectively no effort at all made to in......
4 cases
  • R. v. Travers, 2019 NSCA 83
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 7 Noviembre 2019
    ...2015 SCC 64; R. v. Senek (1998), 130 C.C.C. (3d) 473 (Man. C.A.); R. v. Murphy, 2019 SKCA 8; R. v. Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58; R. v. Finck, 2019 NSCA 60; R. v. Snow, 2019 NSCA 76; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759   Summary: The appellant sought to have his conviction overturned on......
  • R. v. Murphy,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 30 Marzo 2022
    ...2011 NSCA 105, at para. 29; R. v. Fraser, 2011 NSCA 70, at para. 53; R. v. Ross, 2012 NSCA 56; R. v. Buckley, 2013 NSCA 73; R. v. Finck, 2019 NSCA 60; R. v. A.W.H., 2019 NSCA 40, at [78]      The appellant complains trial counsel’s incompetent representation ......
  • R. v. Snow, 2019 NSCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 12 Septiembre 2019
    ...R. v. Ross, 2012 NSCA 56 at para. 51; R. v. Moore, 2002 SKCA 30 at paras. 46-47, 51; R. v. A.W.H., 2019 NSCA 40 at para. 40; R. v. Finck, 2019 NSCA 60 at para. [35] With these principles in mind, I turn to their application in these circumstances. Application of the principles [36] Initiall......
  • R. v. Bussière, 2020 ABPC 2
    • Canada
    • Alberta Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • 3 Enero 2020
    ...at 48) It is essential that the decision be a properly informed one, based on the advice of counsel, when that is available. (R v Finck, 2019 NSCA 60 at 54)  [30]           In this case, there was effectively no effort at all made to in......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT