R. v. Fisher (A.T.)

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeFradsham, P.C.J.
Citation[2014] A.R. Uned. 151 (PC),[2014] A.R. Uned. 151,2014 ABPC 32
Date13 February 2014
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • R. v. Hitchings
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 11, 2019
    ...vehicle? [22]           Though I rely upon the entirety of my analysis in R. v. Fisher 2014 ABPC 32, the following excerpt (paragraphs 22-26; and 28) from that decision is sufficient to set out my understanding of the relevant 22  &nbsp......
  • R. v. Heisie (S.C.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. JL.133
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 6, 2015
    ...control beyond a reasonable doubt. He acquitted Mr. Yakobchuk of care or control. [42] In the post Boudreault Alberta case of R v Fisher 2014 ABPC 32 Mr. Fisher drove from Edmonton to Calgary to visit a friend. He parked in the vicinity of his friend's residence as he was unable to locate i......
  • R. v. Loney
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • January 31, 2025
    ...scene, and (13) whether the accused had a cell phone with which to make other arrangements and failed to do so.  41. In R. v. Fisher, 2014 ABPC 32, Fradsham, PCJ outlined the following six broad factors at paragraph 32: (1)          Nature and st......
  • R. v. Kupper (B.K.)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 26, 2014
    ...on the part of Mr. Kupper in relation to the motor vehicle create a realistic risk of danger to persons or property? [22] In R. v. Fisher 2014 ABPC 32, I set out my understanding of the law relating to "care or control", and what will constitute proof beyond a reasonable doubt that an accus......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • R. v. Heisie (S.C.), [2015] A.R. TBEd. JL.133
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 6, 2015
    ...control beyond a reasonable doubt. He acquitted Mr. Yakobchuk of care or control. [42] In the post Boudreault Alberta case of R v Fisher 2014 ABPC 32 Mr. Fisher drove from Edmonton to Calgary to visit a friend. He parked in the vicinity of his friend's residence as he was unable to locate i......
  • R. v. Hitchings
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 11, 2019
    ...vehicle? [22]           Though I rely upon the entirety of my analysis in R. v. Fisher 2014 ABPC 32, the following excerpt (paragraphs 22-26; and 28) from that decision is sufficient to set out my understanding of the relevant 22  &nbsp......
  • R. v. Loney
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • January 31, 2025
    ...scene, and (13) whether the accused had a cell phone with which to make other arrangements and failed to do so.  41. In R. v. Fisher, 2014 ABPC 32, Fradsham, PCJ outlined the following six broad factors at paragraph 32: (1)          Nature and st......
  • R. v. Kupper (B.K.)
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 26, 2014
    ...on the part of Mr. Kupper in relation to the motor vehicle create a realistic risk of danger to persons or property? [22] In R. v. Fisher 2014 ABPC 32, I set out my understanding of the law relating to "care or control", and what will constitute proof beyond a reasonable doubt that an accus......
  • Get Started for Free