R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9

Docket Number38300
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
CourtSupreme Court of Canada
Case DateApril 02, 2020
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2020 SCC 9
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
217 practice notes
  • Ontario (Attorney General) v. G, 2020 SCC 38
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Canada
    • November 20, 2020
    ...1 S.C.R. 933; Ferguson v. Regional Mental Health Care St. Thomas, 2010 ONCA 810, 271 O.A.C. 104; Kassa (Re), 2019 ONCA 313; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; Doucet‑Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S......
  • R v Bains, 2021 ABPC 20
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court (Alberta)
    • January 15, 2021
    ...14 (SCC), selected pages; R. v. Brar, 2016 ONCA 724; R. v. Bains, 2019 ABPC 291 (CanLII); R. v. Andrukonis, 2012 ABCA 148; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. Arcand, 2010 ABCA 363, selected pages; R. v. Drouin, 1994 CanLII 4622 (SKCA); R. v. D.G.F., 2010 ONCA 27; R. v. Pham, 2013 SCC 15; R. v......
  • R v Garland, 2021 ABCA 46
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 8, 2021
    ...or mitigating factor) that had an impact on the sentence: R. v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras 41, 44, [2015] 3 SCR 1089; R. v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at para 26, 444 DLR (4th) 1. The same standard of review applies to determinations of parole ineligibility: R. v Shropshire, [1995] 4 SCR 227 at p......
  • R v Ratt, 2021 SKCA 7
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
    • January 21, 2021
    ...only if it is demonstrably unfit or the sentencing judge made an error in principle that had an impact on the sentence (R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at paras 25–26, 391 CCC (3d) 309 [Friesen]; R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras 41–48, [2015] 3 SCR 1089 [Lacasse]; R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34 at para 24......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
217 cases
  • Ontario (Attorney General) v. G, 2020 SCC 38
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Canada
    • November 20, 2020
    ...1 S.C.R. 933; Ferguson v. Regional Mental Health Care St. Thomas, 2010 ONCA 810, 271 O.A.C. 104; Kassa (Re), 2019 ONCA 313; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc., 2001 SCC 81, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; Doucet‑Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S......
  • R v Bains, 2021 ABPC 20
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court (Alberta)
    • January 15, 2021
    ...14 (SCC), selected pages; R. v. Brar, 2016 ONCA 724; R. v. Bains, 2019 ABPC 291 (CanLII); R. v. Andrukonis, 2012 ABCA 148; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. Arcand, 2010 ABCA 363, selected pages; R. v. Drouin, 1994 CanLII 4622 (SKCA); R. v. D.G.F., 2010 ONCA 27; R. v. Pham, 2013 SCC 15; R. v......
  • R v Garland, 2021 ABCA 46
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 8, 2021
    ...or mitigating factor) that had an impact on the sentence: R. v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras 41, 44, [2015] 3 SCR 1089; R. v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at para 26, 444 DLR (4th) 1. The same standard of review applies to determinations of parole ineligibility: R. v Shropshire, [1995] 4 SCR 227 at p......
  • R v Ratt, 2021 SKCA 7
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
    • January 21, 2021
    ...only if it is demonstrably unfit or the sentencing judge made an error in principle that had an impact on the sentence (R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at paras 25–26, 391 CCC (3d) 309 [Friesen]; R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras 41–48, [2015] 3 SCR 1089 [Lacasse]; R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34 at para 24......
  • Request a trial to view additional results