R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
Citation2020 SCC 9
Date02 April 2020
Docket Number38300
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
941 practice notes
  • R v Hilbach, 2020 ABCA 332
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 18, 2020
    ...paras 41, 44; R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34, para 24, [2018] 2 SCR 496; R v DSC, 2018 ABCA 335, paras 14-18, [2019] 3 WWR 259; R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9, paras [30] The constitutional validity of legislation is a question of law subject to the standard of review of correctness: Housen v Nikolaisen, ......
  • R. v. Sharma, 2022 SCC 39
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 4, 2022
    ...[1994] 3 S.C.R. 761; R. v. Appulonappa, 2015 SCC 59, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 754; R. v. M. (C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. Parranto, 2021 SCC 46; R. v. St‑Cloud, 2015 SCC 27, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 328; Chiarelli v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration),......
  • R. v. Nahanee, 2022 SCC 37
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 27, 2022
    ...into the framework for appellate intervention set out in R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089 , and R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9. The decisions in Lacasse and Friesen do not detract from the Court’s longstanding recognition that procedural unfairness is an independent bas......
  • R v Hilbach,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 27, 2023
    ...2022 SCC 23; R. v. Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58, [2018] 3 S.C.R. 599; R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 206; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9, [2020] 1 S.C.R. 424; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. Goltz, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 485; R. v. Lat......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
907 cases
  • R v Hilbach, 2020 ABCA 332
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 18, 2020
    ...paras 41, 44; R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34, para 24, [2018] 2 SCR 496; R v DSC, 2018 ABCA 335, paras 14-18, [2019] 3 WWR 259; R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9, paras [30] The constitutional validity of legislation is a question of law subject to the standard of review of correctness: Housen v Nikolaisen, ......
  • R. v. Sharma, 2022 SCC 39
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 4, 2022
    ...[1994] 3 S.C.R. 761; R. v. Appulonappa, 2015 SCC 59, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 754; R. v. M. (C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. Parranto, 2021 SCC 46; R. v. St‑Cloud, 2015 SCC 27, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 328; Chiarelli v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration),......
  • R. v. Nahanee, 2022 SCC 37
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 27, 2022
    ...into the framework for appellate intervention set out in R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 , [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089 , and R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9. The decisions in Lacasse and Friesen do not detract from the Court’s longstanding recognition that procedural unfairness is an independent bas......
  • R. v. Parranto,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...R. v. Arcand, 2010 ABCA 363, 40 Alta. L.R. (5th) 199; referred to: R. v. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, [2015] 3 S.C.R. 1089; R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9; R. v. M. (C.A.), [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; R. v. Shropshire, [1995] 4 S.C.R. 227; R. v. Williams, 2019 BCCA 295; R. v. Sandercock (1985), 40 Alta. L.R. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • What Regulators Can Learn From The Criminal Courts About Sexual Abuse Cases
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 23, 2021
    ...Footnotes 1 Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991, S.O. 1991, c. 18. 2 R. v. Slatter, 2020 SCC 36. 3 Slatter, at para. 2. 4 R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9. 5 Friesen, at para. 6 Friesen, at para. 146 [citations omitted]. 7 R. v. Visscher, 2012 BCCA 290, cited at para. 146 of Friesen. 8 In the M......
10 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Sentencing in Canada
    • June 26, 2020
    ...ABQB 717 ............................................................................................................... 266 R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 ............................................................................................................. 134, 179 R v Frittaion, [1997] O......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Law. Eighth edition
    • September 1, 2022
    ...77 Alta LR (2d) 79, 101 CCC (3d) 167 (CA) ............................................................................... 482 R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 ......................................................543, 544, 547, 558, 585 R v FW Woolworth Co (1974), 3 OR (2d) 629, 18 CCC (2d) 23, 46 D......
  • Conclusion: Trends in Criminal Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Law. Eighth edition
    • September 1, 2022
    ...Craig, Putting Trials on Trial: Sexual Assault and the Failure of the Legal Profession (Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, 2018). 40 2020 SCC 9. 41 Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (AG) , 2004 SCC 4 [C anadian Foundation for Children ]. 42 Ibid at para 6. ......
  • The Meaning of Life: A Study of the Use of Parole Ineligibility for Murder Sentencing.
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2021
    ...Terrorism Charges and Terrorism Trials in Canada Between September 2001 and September 2018" (2019) 67:1/2 Crim LQ 95. (52) See R v Friesen, 2020 SCC 9 at para (53) Ibid at paras 37-38. See also R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64 at paras 39-41 [Lacasse]; R v M (CA), [1996] 1 SCR 500, 105 CCC (3d) 327......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT