R. v. G.F.,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SCC 20 |
| Citation | 2021 SCC 20 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 01 January 0001 |
| Docket Number | 2021scc20 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. JM, 2021 NSSC 307
...JM allegedly inserted his penis into her vagina. [3] I have taken into account the updated jurisprudence as well, including R v GF, 2021 SCC 20 and R v MHL, 2021 NSCA 74. I also note that R v RA, 2017 ONCA 714 was since upheld in 2018 SCC [4] Based on the credible evidence of Constab......
-
Mihoren v. Quesnel, 2021 ONCA 898
...“Dismissal Order”) of her application for spousal support. [63] In R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, 71 C.R. (7th) 1, the majority of the Supreme Court recalled, for the benefit of intermediate appellate courts, the importance of a function......
-
R. v. Priestap, 2021 ONCA 920
...explain what the trial judge decided and why they decided that way in a manner that permits effective appellate review: R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, 71 C.R. (7th) 1, at para. [7] In the present case, the trial judge’s reaso......
-
R. v J.A.F., 2021 NSSC 357
...Judge’s reasons are ambiguous. The appeal Court must determine the extent and significance of the ambiguity. (In R v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20 at paragraph 79, the Supreme Court adopted from Sheppard, what I summarize in paragraphs 25-27 of this [28] The ......
4 cases
-
R. v. JM, 2021 NSSC 307
...JM allegedly inserted his penis into her vagina. [3] I have taken into account the updated jurisprudence as well, including R v GF, 2021 SCC 20 and R v MHL, 2021 NSCA 74. I also note that R v RA, 2017 ONCA 714 was since upheld in 2018 SCC [4] Based on the credible evidence of Constab......
-
Mihoren v. Quesnel, 2021 ONCA 898
...“Dismissal Order”) of her application for spousal support. [63] In R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, 71 C.R. (7th) 1, the majority of the Supreme Court recalled, for the benefit of intermediate appellate courts, the importance of a function......
-
R. v. Priestap, 2021 ONCA 920
...explain what the trial judge decided and why they decided that way in a manner that permits effective appellate review: R. v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20, 71 C.R. (7th) 1, at para. [7] In the present case, the trial judge’s reaso......
-
R. v J.A.F., 2021 NSSC 357
...Judge’s reasons are ambiguous. The appeal Court must determine the extent and significance of the ambiguity. (In R v. G.F., 2021 SCC 20 at paragraph 79, the Supreme Court adopted from Sheppard, what I summarize in paragraphs 25-27 of this [28] The ......