R. v. G.N., 2019 NUCA 5

JurisdictionNunavut
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Karan M. Shaner,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz,The Honourable Madam Justice Sheila Greckol
Citation2019 NUCA 5
Docket Number24-18-11-CAP
CourtNunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
Date07 October 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R v Sidhu,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 1, 2022
    ...on those concerns, including the possibility of allowing the accused to withdraw his or her guilty plea”). [67] The Queen v. G.N., 2019 NUCA 5, ¶ 14 per Shaner, J.A. (“Although the parties did not make a joint submission on sentence, the principles derived from Anthony-Co......
  • R v Serafino,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...conferred on sentencing judges by s. 732.1(3)(h), banishment conditions are not routinely made. This is understandable. In R v G.N., 2019 NUCA 5 at para 17 [G.N.], the Nunavut Court of Appeal observed that banishment from an offender’s home community will be justified “only in exceptional c......
  • Banishment in Aboriginal Law: Rules, Rights, Practice And Limitations.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 73, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...212 CCC (3d) 254, 2006 CanLII 32312 (ONCA) at paras 6-7 [Rowe\. See also R v Bishop, 2017 CanLII 45561 (NLSC) at para 30. (24) R v GN, 2019 NUCA 5 at para (25) R v L et al, 2012 BCPC 503 at para 76 [R v L]. (27) Felix, supra note 19 at para 27. See also R v Banks (1991), 3 CRR (2d) 366, 199......
2 cases
  • R v Sidhu,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 1, 2022
    ...on those concerns, including the possibility of allowing the accused to withdraw his or her guilty plea”). [67] The Queen v. G.N., 2019 NUCA 5, ¶ 14 per Shaner, J.A. (“Although the parties did not make a joint submission on sentence, the principles derived from Anthony-Co......
  • R v Serafino,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...conferred on sentencing judges by s. 732.1(3)(h), banishment conditions are not routinely made. This is understandable. In R v G.N., 2019 NUCA 5 at para 17 [G.N.], the Nunavut Court of Appeal observed that banishment from an offender’s home community will be justified “only in exceptional c......
1 books & journal articles
  • Banishment in Aboriginal Law: Rules, Rights, Practice And Limitations.
    • Canada
    • University of New Brunswick Law Journal No. 73, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...212 CCC (3d) 254, 2006 CanLII 32312 (ONCA) at paras 6-7 [Rowe\. See also R v Bishop, 2017 CanLII 45561 (NLSC) at para 30. (24) R v GN, 2019 NUCA 5 at para (25) R v L et al, 2012 BCPC 503 at para 76 [R v L]. (27) Felix, supra note 19 at para 27. See also R v Banks (1991), 3 CRR (2d) 366, 199......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT