R. v G.T.D., 2017 ABCA 274

JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Barbara Lea Veldhuis,The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz
Citation2017 ABCA 274
Docket Number1603-0143-A
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Date25 August 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
26 practice notes
  • R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 9, 2022
    ...[1987] 1 S.C.R. 265; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494; R. v. Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 202; R. v. G.T.D., 2017 ABCA 274, 57 Alta. L.R. (6th) 213, rev’d 2018 SCC 7, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Côté, 2011 SCC 46, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215; R. v. Mian, 2014 SCC 54, [2014]......
  • Exclusion of Evidence
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ..., supra note 100 at para 67; R v Harlett , 2016 ONCA 248 at paras 40-45; R v Gonzales , supra note 95 at para 170; R v GDT , 2017 ABCA 274 at paras 80-93, Veldhuis JA, dissenting, rev’d 2018 SCC 7 substantially for the reasons of Veldhuis JA. © 2023 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ...OJ No 3335 (QL) (Sup Ct J) ............. 228 GC, R v, 2010 ONSC 115 ..................................................... 98 GDT, R v, 2017 ABCA 274, rev’d 2018 SCC 7 ................................. 50-51 Ghotra, R v, 2021 SCC 12 , af ’g 2020 ONCA 373 ............................... . 119......
  • Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...Court of Appeal in Regina v Kelly 65 seized upon these diferences to impart diferent meanings. The Court noted the “subtle 62 R v GTD , 2017 ABCA 274 at paras 18, 77, rev’d on remedy 2018 SCC 7 at para 2 . All judges at both levels of court held that the question breached s 10(b). See also ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
21 cases
  • R. v. Beaver, 2022 SCC 54
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 9, 2022
    ...[1987] 1 S.C.R. 265; R. v. Harrison, 2009 SCC 34, [2009] 2 S.C.R. 494; R. v. Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 202; R. v. G.T.D., 2017 ABCA 274, 57 Alta. L.R. (6th) 213, rev’d 2018 SCC 7, [2018] 1 S.C.R. 220; R. v. Côté, 2011 SCC 46, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 215; R. v. Mian, 2014 SCC 54, [2014]......
  • R. v. Williams, 2018 ONSC 3654
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 13, 2018
    ...generally communicated in terms of, “you do not have to say anything”: PRPS Caution to Arrestee (Exhibit #18, para. 6); Regina v. G.T.D., 2017 ABCA 274, at para. 3 (affd 2018 SCC 7); Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Code C Revised (Code of Practice for the detention, treatment and que......
  • R v Moyles, 2019 SKCA 72
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • July 30, 2019
    ...that the trial judge erred by failing to consider the systemic nature of the breach. As Veldhuis J.A. said in her dissent in R v G.T.D., 2017 ABCA 274, 355 CCC (3d) 431, which was affirmed at 2018 SCC 7, [2018] 1 SCR [85] Courts must take institutional or systemic Charter breaches seriously......
  • R v Vaillancourt, 2019 ABCA 317
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 3, 2019
    ...is of some importance since an institutional or systemic Charter breach will be more serious than an isolated incident: R v GTD, 2017 ABCA 274 at para 82, per Veldhuis JA in dissent, aff’d in 2018 SCC 7; R v Ippak, 2018 NUCA 3 at paras 39-43. First, we note that the trial judge did not spec......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ...OJ No 3335 (QL) (Sup Ct J) ............. 228 GC, R v, 2010 ONSC 115 ..................................................... 98 GDT, R v, 2017 ABCA 274, rev’d 2018 SCC 7 ................................. 50-51 Ghotra, R v, 2021 SCC 12 , af ’g 2020 ONCA 373 ............................... . 119......
  • Exclusion of Evidence
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Charter Remedies in Criminal Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 2, 2022
    ..., supra note 100 at para 67; R v Harlett , 2016 ONCA 248 at paras 40-45; R v Gonzales , supra note 95 at para 170; R v GDT , 2017 ABCA 274 at paras 80-93, Veldhuis JA, dissenting, rev’d 2018 SCC 7 substantially for the reasons of Veldhuis JA. © 2023 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...177 Grouse , R v , 2004 NSCA 108 .................................................. 336 GTD , R v , 2017 ABCA 274, rev’d 2018 SCC 7 ............................ 337, 369, 385 Guenter , R v , 2016 ONCA 572 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25, 31, 43, 47-48, 282, 36......
  • Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
    • Canada
    • Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...Court of Appeal in Regina v Kelly 65 seized upon these diferences to impart diferent meanings. The Court noted the “subtle 62 R v GTD , 2017 ABCA 274 at paras 18, 77, rev’d on remedy 2018 SCC 7 at para 2 . All judges at both levels of court held that the question breached s 10(b). See also ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT