R v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278
| Judge | L.T.L. Cook-Stanhope |
| Docket Number | 170477426Y101001 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 28 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v AY, 2019 ABPC 325
...lenient sentence (i.e. probation) as opposed to a custodial sentence (R v JAH, 2018 MBCA 58 (JAH); R v PR, 2018 SKCA 27 (PR); R v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278 The Legislation [16] Relevant provisions of the YCJA include the following: Purpose 38 (1) The purpose of sentencing under section 42 (youth s......
-
R v JK,
...and reasons be offered if it is not adopted … (R v PKK, 2006 ABCA 1). [21] In R v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278, my late sister Judge L.T.L Cook Stanhope, noted that the Court of Appeal does not mandate a stiffer penalty in every instance where a deferr......
-
R v KMF,
...a DCSO ought to be imposed. [25] The issue was next considered by Cook-Stanhope J in R v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278. In that case the young offender and another committed an aggravated assault. At paragraphs 30 to 36, after quoting the above excerpt from PK......
-
R v DA,
...and Ontario. [37] My sister, the late Cook-Stanhope, J. addressed the same issue in R. v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278 and pointed out that the wording used by the Court of Appeal in PKK, did not mandate a heavier sentence in every instance where a DCSO was un......
4 cases
-
R v AY, 2019 ABPC 325
...lenient sentence (i.e. probation) as opposed to a custodial sentence (R v JAH, 2018 MBCA 58 (JAH); R v PR, 2018 SKCA 27 (PR); R v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278 The Legislation [16] Relevant provisions of the YCJA include the following: Purpose 38 (1) The purpose of sentencing under section 42 (youth s......
-
R v JK,
...and reasons be offered if it is not adopted … (R v PKK, 2006 ABCA 1). [21] In R v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278, my late sister Judge L.T.L Cook Stanhope, noted that the Court of Appeal does not mandate a stiffer penalty in every instance where a deferr......
-
R v KMF,
...a DCSO ought to be imposed. [25] The issue was next considered by Cook-Stanhope J in R v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278. In that case the young offender and another committed an aggravated assault. At paragraphs 30 to 36, after quoting the above excerpt from PK......
-
R v DA,
...and Ontario. [37] My sister, the late Cook-Stanhope, J. addressed the same issue in R. v GDP, 2018 ABPC 278 and pointed out that the wording used by the Court of Appeal in PKK, did not mandate a heavier sentence in every instance where a DCSO was un......