R. v. Gill,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Simmons, Watt and Miller JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2019 ONCA 902 |
| Docket Number | C64647 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 14 November 2019 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 November 15, 2019)
...Purpose of Trafficking, Jury Trials, Jury Instructions, W.(D.) Instruction, Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, ss. 4(1), 5(2) R. v. G., 2019 ONCA 902 Keywords: Criminal Law, Attempting to Possess Heroin for the Purpose of Trafficking, Mens Rea, Sentencing, Criminal Code, s. 718.1, R. v. L......
-
R. v. Rouse,
...R. v. Delorey, 2010 NSCA 65 quoting R. v. Peters, 2008 BCCA 446; R. v. Deviller, 2005 NSCA 71; R. v. Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103; R. v. Gill, 2019 ONCA 902 The appellant was convicted at trial of obtaining sexual services for consideration. He sought to have his conviction overturned and an acquit......
-
R v Lisso,
...R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732, at para. 2; R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 3, at para. 56; and R. v. Gill, 2019 ONCA 902, at para. The third and final error alleged – that the trial judge received much inadmissible and prejudicial hearsay evidence 38 I would no......
-
R. v. P.M.,
...decision in that manner, there appears to be ample authority that the decision falls within the trial judge’s discretion; see R. v. Gill, 2019 ONCA 902, approving of R. c. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, at para … the choice of sentencing range or of a category within a range falls within the trial j......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
R. v. Rouse,
...R. v. Delorey, 2010 NSCA 65 quoting R. v. Peters, 2008 BCCA 446; R. v. Deviller, 2005 NSCA 71; R. v. Wolff, 2019 SKCA 103; R. v. Gill, 2019 ONCA 902 The appellant was convicted at trial of obtaining sexual services for consideration. He sought to have his conviction overturned and an acquit......
-
R v Lisso,
...R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732, at para. 2; R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 3, at para. 56; and R. v. Gill, 2019 ONCA 902, at para. The third and final error alleged – that the trial judge received much inadmissible and prejudicial hearsay evidence 38 I would no......
-
R. v. P.M.,
...decision in that manner, there appears to be ample authority that the decision falls within the trial judge’s discretion; see R. v. Gill, 2019 ONCA 902, approving of R. c. Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64, at para … the choice of sentencing range or of a category within a range falls within the trial j......
-
R v N.P.,
...56; R. v. Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 732, at para. 2; R. v. Sinclair, 2011 SCC 40, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 3, at para. 56; R. v. Gill, 2019 ONCA 902, at para. 10. The appellant failed to satisfy his burden on this strict 17 The trial judge made findings of credibility concerning the testi......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 11 November 15, 2019)
...Purpose of Trafficking, Jury Trials, Jury Instructions, W.(D.) Instruction, Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, ss. 4(1), 5(2) R. v. G., 2019 ONCA 902 Keywords: Criminal Law, Attempting to Possess Heroin for the Purpose of Trafficking, Mens Rea, Sentencing, Criminal Code, s. 718.1, R. v. L......