R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Patricia Rowbotham,The Honourable Madam Justice Dawn Pentelechuk,The Honourable Mr. Justice Jack Watson |
| Date | 28 October 2019 |
| Citation | 2019 ABCA 406 |
| Docket Number | 1903-0084-A |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639
...to consider all of the relevant circumstances: R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34 at paras 47-59; R v Pham, 2013 SCC 15 at paras 11-12; R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406 at para 42. Collateral consequences do not relate to the gravity of the offence or the level of responsibility of the offender, but rather s......
-
R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
...with regard to sentences for the so-called social trafficker. What constitutes social trafficking was described in R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406, 94 Alta LR (6th) 307, as an unorganized transfer by one addict to another in a social context or “one-off opportunistic transactions” (at para 36). ......
-
R v Hunt, 2021 ABPC 267
...ABCA 458; R v Frazer 2017 ABPC 116; R v Friesen 2020 SCC 9; R v Friesen 2019 BCSC 1038; R v Gardiner [1982] 2 SCR 368; R v Gittens 2019 ABCA 406; R v Hoang [2002] OJ No 1355 (SCJ); R v Jackson-Bullshields 2015 BCPC 411; R v Joon 2017 BCPC 301; R v Khan 2019 BCPC 300; R v Knott 2012 SC......
-
R v Sharifi-Jamali, 2022 ABQB 52
...in support of their initial joint submission: R v Maskell, 1981 ABCA 50; R v McCulloch, 2011 ABCA 124, at para 4; and R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406. [29] Maskell, the root authority for over 40 years, held (para 11) that “all cases of ... posses......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639
...to consider all of the relevant circumstances: R v Suter, 2018 SCC 34 at paras 47-59; R v Pham, 2013 SCC 15 at paras 11-12; R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406 at para 42. Collateral consequences do not relate to the gravity of the offence or the level of responsibility of the offender, but rather s......
-
R v Williams, 2020 SKCA 108
...with regard to sentences for the so-called social trafficker. What constitutes social trafficking was described in R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406, 94 Alta LR (6th) 307, as an unorganized transfer by one addict to another in a social context or “one-off opportunistic transactions” (at para 36). ......
-
R v Hunt, 2021 ABPC 267
...ABCA 458; R v Frazer 2017 ABPC 116; R v Friesen 2020 SCC 9; R v Friesen 2019 BCSC 1038; R v Gardiner [1982] 2 SCR 368; R v Gittens 2019 ABCA 406; R v Hoang [2002] OJ No 1355 (SCJ); R v Jackson-Bullshields 2015 BCPC 411; R v Joon 2017 BCPC 301; R v Khan 2019 BCPC 300; R v Knott 2012 SC......
-
R v Sharifi-Jamali, 2022 ABQB 52
...in support of their initial joint submission: R v Maskell, 1981 ABCA 50; R v McCulloch, 2011 ABCA 124, at para 4; and R v Gittens, 2019 ABCA 406. [29] Maskell, the root authority for over 40 years, held (para 11) that “all cases of ... posses......
Get Started for Free