R. v. Golov, 2017 ONSC 6672

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHill J
Docket NumberCRIMJ(P) 1931/16
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Date06 December 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 28, 2021
    ...paras. 37, 45-47; R. v. Watson, [1996] O.J. No. 2695 at para. 47 (CA); R. v. Varga, 2001 CanLII 8610 (ONCA) at paras. 71-76; R. v. Golov, 2017 ONSC 6672 at paras. 38-51. [30]        I find that applying these principles to the record before the court, Josh......
  • R. v. McRae,, 2018 ONSC 3743
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 19, 2018
    ...  [7]    As to the permissible scope of such disposition evidence, as Hill J. observed in R. v. Golov, 2017 ONSC 6672 (CanLII), [2017] O.J. No. 6810, at para. 49, the jurisprudence supports the proposition Evidence of a deceased’s prior disposi......
2 cases
  • R. v. MacKinnon,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 28, 2021
    ...paras. 37, 45-47; R. v. Watson, [1996] O.J. No. 2695 at para. 47 (CA); R. v. Varga, 2001 CanLII 8610 (ONCA) at paras. 71-76; R. v. Golov, 2017 ONSC 6672 at paras. 38-51. [30]        I find that applying these principles to the record before the court, Josh......
  • R. v. McRae,, 2018 ONSC 3743
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 19, 2018
    ...  [7]    As to the permissible scope of such disposition evidence, as Hill J. observed in R. v. Golov, 2017 ONSC 6672 (CanLII), [2017] O.J. No. 6810, at para. 49, the jurisprudence supports the proposition Evidence of a deceased’s prior disposi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT