R. v. GOODPIPE

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
JudgeMcCREARY
Citation2019 SKQB 221
Docket NumberCRM 7 of 2017
Date06 September 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R v Napope
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...that a lesser sentence will adequately protect the public (see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 11-12......
  • R. v. Dionne
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...that a lesser sentence will adequately protect the public (see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras [193]......
  • R v Goodpipe
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 9, 2021
    ...In concurrence: The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann The Honourable Mr. Justice Barrington-Foote On appeal from: CRM 7 of 2017 and 2019 SKQB 221, Regina Appeal March 17, 2021 Counsel: Brian Pfefferle for the Appellant W. Dean Sinclair, Q.C., for the Respondent Richards C.J.S. I. INTRODUCTIO......
3 cases
  • R v Napope
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 4, 2023
    ...that a lesser sentence will adequately protect the public (see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras 11-12......
  • R. v. Dionne
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • September 22, 2023
    ...that a lesser sentence will adequately protect the public (see: R v Otto, 2006 SKCA 52 at para 22, 279 Sask R 182; R v Goodpipe, 2019 SKQB 221 at para 55, affirmed 2021 SKCA 122; R v Ballantyne, 2019 SKPC 32 at para 85, affirmed 2022 SKCA 13; and R v Bitternose, 2013 ABCA 220 at paras [193]......
  • R v Goodpipe
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • September 9, 2021
    ...In concurrence: The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann The Honourable Mr. Justice Barrington-Foote On appeal from: CRM 7 of 2017 and 2019 SKQB 221, Regina Appeal March 17, 2021 Counsel: Brian Pfefferle for the Appellant W. Dean Sinclair, Q.C., for the Respondent Richards C.J.S. I. INTRODUCTIO......