R. v. Grant, 2019 BCCA 369
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Madam Justice Stromberg-Stein,The Honourable Madam Justice Griffin |
| Citation | 2019 BCCA 369 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45497 |
| Date | 11 October 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. S.S.,
...similar evidence is handled under s. 276 of the Criminal Code when it concerns complainants. The appellant relies on R. v. Grant, 2019 BCCA 369, for the principle that although there is no s. 276 equivalent for accused persons, any restriction on the use of an accused’s sex......
-
R. v. C.A.J.,
...kind and loving sentiments, that she is less credible in her allegations.” [44] In R. v. Grant, 2018 BCSC 413, reversed on other grounds: 2019 BCCA 369, Affleck J., rejected a Defence argument on the basis that it was found to be based on similar stereotypical reasoning, stating as follows ......
2 cases
-
R. v. S.S.,
...similar evidence is handled under s. 276 of the Criminal Code when it concerns complainants. The appellant relies on R. v. Grant, 2019 BCCA 369, for the principle that although there is no s. 276 equivalent for accused persons, any restriction on the use of an accused’s sex......
-
R. v. C.A.J.,
...kind and loving sentiments, that she is less credible in her allegations.” [44] In R. v. Grant, 2018 BCSC 413, reversed on other grounds: 2019 BCCA 369, Affleck J., rejected a Defence argument on the basis that it was found to be based on similar stereotypical reasoning, stating as follows ......