R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Barbara M. Hamilton,Diana M. Cameron,Christopher J. Mainella |
| Citation | 2018 MBCA 122 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Docket Number | AR16-30-08641 |
| Date | 19 November 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 practice notes
-
R. v. Barrett,
...268; R. v. Chretien, 2014 ONCA 403; R. v. Barrett, 2016 NSSC 43; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122; R. v. Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396; D’Amico c. R., 2019 QCCA 77; R. v. Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260; R. v. Khalon, 2020 ABCA 124; R v. Herntier, 2020 MBCA ......
-
R v Badger,
...and usefully referred to as spontaneous utterance: R v Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260 at paras 58–59 and 78, 145 OR (3d) 241; R v Hall, 2018 MBCA 122 at para 41, [2019] 1 WWR 612 [Hall]; R v Head, 2014 MBCA 59 at para 25, 310 CCC (3d) 474; and R v Khan, [1990] 2 SCR 531 at ......
-
R. v. MacKinnon,
...features” that could give rise to an error by the declarant: Badger, at para. 31; see also, Andrews, at p. 301; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, at paras. 41, 53-55. Courts have also recognized that, in “rare cases”, even traditional exceptions to hearsay – including s......
-
R. v. Schneider,
...omitted; emphasis added.] [74] To understand the scope of the judge’s role at the second stage of the analysis, I find R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, helpful. There, Mainella J.A. (writing for the Court) explained [125] Determining whether the probative value of evidence outweighs its prejudici......
Request a trial to view additional results
30 cases
-
R. v. Barrett,
...268; R. v. Chretien, 2014 ONCA 403; R. v. Barrett, 2016 NSSC 43; R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57; R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122; R. v. Bernard, 2018 ABCA 396; D’Amico c. R., 2019 QCCA 77; R. v. Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260; R. v. Khalon, 2020 ABCA 124; R v. Herntier, 2020 MBCA ......
-
R v Badger,
...and usefully referred to as spontaneous utterance: R v Nurse, 2019 ONCA 260 at paras 58–59 and 78, 145 OR (3d) 241; R v Hall, 2018 MBCA 122 at para 41, [2019] 1 WWR 612 [Hall]; R v Head, 2014 MBCA 59 at para 25, 310 CCC (3d) 474; and R v Khan, [1990] 2 SCR 531 at ......
-
R. v. MacKinnon,
...features” that could give rise to an error by the declarant: Badger, at para. 31; see also, Andrews, at p. 301; R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, at paras. 41, 53-55. Courts have also recognized that, in “rare cases”, even traditional exceptions to hearsay – including s......
-
R. v. Schneider,
...omitted; emphasis added.] [74] To understand the scope of the judge’s role at the second stage of the analysis, I find R. v. Hall, 2018 MBCA 122, helpful. There, Mainella J.A. (writing for the Court) explained [125] Determining whether the probative value of evidence outweighs its prejudici......
Request a trial to view additional results