Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Canada | +1 (343) 700 0450

R v Hape,

Cited authorities 31 Cited in 25 Amendments 15 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JudgeBinnie J.,LeBel J.,Bastarache J.
Neutral Citation2007 SCC 26
Date07 June 2007
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket NumberFile No.: 31125.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Amnistie internationale Canada c. Canada (Chef d'état-major de la Défense) (C.F.),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 12 d3 Março d3 2008
    ...APPLIED: DÉCISION APPLIQUÉE : R. v. Hape, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 292; (2007), 280 D.L.R. (4th) 385; 220 C.C.C. (3d) 16; 47 C.R. (6th) 96; 160 C.R.R. (2d) 1; 363 N.R. 1; 227 O.A.C. 191; 2007 SCC R. c. Hape, [2007] 2 R.C.S. 292; 2007 CSC 26. DISTINGUISHED: DÉCISIONS DIFFÉRENCIÉES : Rasul v. Bush, 54......
  • Macaronies Hair Club and Laser Center Inc v. BofA Canada Bank, 2019 ABQB 181
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 d1 Março d1 2019
    ...courts, comity is more a principle of interpretation than a rule of law, because it does not arise from formal obligations”: R v. Hape (2007) SCC 26, at para. [9] As is apparent from the above references, comity normally deals with respect between different nations, rather than domestically......
  • Xela Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Castillo et al., 2015 ONSC 866
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 5 d4 Fevereiro d4 2015
    ...on the argument that Thorburn J.'s interpretation of the service rules offends the international principle of comity. As in R. v. Hape , [2007] S.C.C. 26 at para. 50, comity is based on a desire for states to act in reciprocity to one another. However, this principle does not override the e......
3 cases
  • Amnistie internationale Canada c. Canada (Chef d'état-major de la Défense) (C.F.),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 12 d3 Março d3 2008
    ...APPLIED: DÉCISION APPLIQUÉE : R. v. Hape, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 292; (2007), 280 D.L.R. (4th) 385; 220 C.C.C. (3d) 16; 47 C.R. (6th) 96; 160 C.R.R. (2d) 1; 363 N.R. 1; 227 O.A.C. 191; 2007 SCC R. c. Hape, [2007] 2 R.C.S. 292; 2007 CSC 26. DISTINGUISHED: DÉCISIONS DIFFÉRENCIÉES : Rasul v. Bush, 54......
  • Macaronies Hair Club and Laser Center Inc v. BofA Canada Bank, 2019 ABQB 181
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 18 d1 Março d1 2019
    ...courts, comity is more a principle of interpretation than a rule of law, because it does not arise from formal obligations”: R v. Hape (2007) SCC 26, at para. [9] As is apparent from the above references, comity normally deals with respect between different nations, rather than domestically......
  • Xela Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Castillo et al., 2015 ONSC 866
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 5 d4 Fevereiro d4 2015
    ...on the argument that Thorburn J.'s interpretation of the service rules offends the international principle of comity. As in R. v. Hape , [2007] S.C.C. 26 at para. 50, comity is based on a desire for states to act in reciprocity to one another. However, this principle does not override the e......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT