R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242

JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice Newbury; The Honourable Madam Justice Dickson; The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Case DateAugust 27, 2020
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2020 BCCA 242
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • United States v. Hollaus,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 3, 2022
    ...grounds to arrest is on the officer who decided to effect the arrest and what that officer knew when the decision was made: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 45. Where more than one officer is involved in the events leading up to the warrantless arrest, the information provided to th......
  • R v Anny,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 6, 2021
    ...accused must have actual knowledge of, or be wilfully blind to, another person’s custody or possession of that object: R v Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para 30, citing R v Vinokurov, 2001 ABCA 113 at paras 11-14. [31]        The accused must also consent......
  • R. v. Chandi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...about that submission. First, a judge is not obliged to discuss every piece of evidence in setting out their conclusions: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 51. Second, and importantly, the appellant’s submission on this ground of appeal fails to appreciate the legal impact of ......
  • R. v. Sekhon, 2020 BCSC 2180
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 22, 2020
    ...to arrest may have been made quickly based on available information which may be less than exact or complete”: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 44, citing R. v. Golub (1997), 117 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (Ont. C.A.). [68]        I must be satisfied that a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • United States v. Hollaus,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 3, 2022
    ...grounds to arrest is on the officer who decided to effect the arrest and what that officer knew when the decision was made: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 45. Where more than one officer is involved in the events leading up to the warrantless arrest, the information provided to th......
  • R v Anny,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • December 6, 2021
    ...accused must have actual knowledge of, or be wilfully blind to, another person’s custody or possession of that object: R v Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para 30, citing R v Vinokurov, 2001 ABCA 113 at paras 11-14. [31]        The accused must also consent......
  • R. v. Chandi,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • November 9, 2020
    ...about that submission. First, a judge is not obliged to discuss every piece of evidence in setting out their conclusions: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 51. Second, and importantly, the appellant’s submission on this ground of appeal fails to appreciate the legal impact of ......
  • R. v. Sekhon, 2020 BCSC 2180
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 22, 2020
    ...to arrest may have been made quickly based on available information which may be less than exact or complete”: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 44, citing R. v. Golub (1997), 117 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (Ont. C.A.). [68]        I must be satisfied that a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT