R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242
Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Newbury; The Honourable Madam Justice Dickson; The Honourable Mr. Justice Hunter |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Case Date | August 27, 2020 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | 2020 BCCA 242 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
United States v. Hollaus,
...grounds to arrest is on the officer who decided to effect the arrest and what that officer knew when the decision was made: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 45. Where more than one officer is involved in the events leading up to the warrantless arrest, the information provided to th......
-
R v Anny,
...accused must have actual knowledge of, or be wilfully blind to, another person’s custody or possession of that object: R v Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para 30, citing R v Vinokurov, 2001 ABCA 113 at paras 11-14. [31] The accused must also consent......
-
R. v. Chandi,
...about that submission. First, a judge is not obliged to discuss every piece of evidence in setting out their conclusions: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 51. Second, and importantly, the appellant’s submission on this ground of appeal fails to appreciate the legal impact of ......
-
R. v. Sekhon, 2020 BCSC 2180
...to arrest may have been made quickly based on available information which may be less than exact or complete”: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 44, citing R. v. Golub (1997), 117 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (Ont. C.A.). [68] I must be satisfied that a......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
United States v. Hollaus,
...grounds to arrest is on the officer who decided to effect the arrest and what that officer knew when the decision was made: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 45. Where more than one officer is involved in the events leading up to the warrantless arrest, the information provided to th......
-
R v Anny,
...accused must have actual knowledge of, or be wilfully blind to, another person’s custody or possession of that object: R v Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para 30, citing R v Vinokurov, 2001 ABCA 113 at paras 11-14. [31] The accused must also consent......
-
R. v. Chandi,
...about that submission. First, a judge is not obliged to discuss every piece of evidence in setting out their conclusions: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 51. Second, and importantly, the appellant’s submission on this ground of appeal fails to appreciate the legal impact of ......
-
R. v. Sekhon, 2020 BCSC 2180
...to arrest may have been made quickly based on available information which may be less than exact or complete”: R. v. Harms, 2020 BCCA 242 at para. 44, citing R. v. Golub (1997), 117 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (Ont. C.A.). [68] I must be satisfied that a......
Request a trial to view additional results