R. v. Hawkins,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Lamer, Antonio; La Forest, Gérard V.; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Sopinka, John; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Cory, Peter deCarteret; McLachlin, Beverley; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C. |
| Date | 28 November 1996 |
| Citation | [1996] 3 SCR 1043,141 DLR (4th) 193,[1996] SCJ No 117 (QL),32 WCB (2d) 388,96 OAC 81,2 CR (5th) 245,30 OR (3d) 641,1996 CanLII 154 (SCC),204 NR 241,111 CCC (3d) 129,[1996] ACS no 117,JE 96-2285,[1996] OJ No 117 (QL),EYB 1996-67709 |
| Docket Number | 24633, 24634 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
436 practice notes
-
R. v. Grandinetti (C.H.), 2003 ABCA 307
...[para. 145]. Reference Re R. v. Latta (1976), 30 C.C.C.(2d) 208 (Alta. C.A.), dist. [para. 150]. R. v. Hawkins (K.R.) and Morin (C.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; 204 N.R. 241; 96 O.A.C. 81; 111 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Kerans, Roger P., Standards of Review Employ......
-
R. v. Assoun (G.E.),
...50]. R. v. P.S.B. (2004), 222 N.S.R.(2d) 26; 701 A.P.R. 26; 2004 NSCA 25, refd to. [para. 54]. R. v. Hawkins (K.R.) and Morin (C.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; 204 N.R. 241; 96 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 57]. R. v. Smith (A.L.), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915; 139 N.R. 323; 55 O.A.C. 321, refd to. [para. 60......
-
R. v. Terrico (W.J.),
...approach to distinguish between threshold and ultimate reliability. Only the former is relevant to admissibility: see Hawkins , [[1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043], at p. 1084. Again, it is not appropriate in the circumstances of this appeal to provide an exhaustive catalogue of the factors that may inf......
-
R. v. Starr (R.D.), (2000) 258 N.R. 250 (SCC)
...[1991] 3 S.C.R. 654; 131 N.R. 161; 50 O.A.C. 125; 68 C.C.C.(3d) 289, refd to. [para. 45]. R. v. Hawkins (K.R.) and Morin (C.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; 204 N.R. 241; 96 O.A.C. 81; 111 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [paras. 52, 191]. R. v. Chahley (N.W.) (1992), 13 B.C.A.C. 213; 24 W.A.C. 213; 72 C.C......
Get Started for Free
386 cases
-
R. v. Khelawon
...came about provided sufficient comfort in their truth and accuracy. R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740 , and R. v. Hawkins, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043, provide examples where threshold reliability was based on the presence of adequate substitutes for traditional safeguards relied upon to test ......
-
R. v. Khelawon (R.)
...(2001), 198 N.S.R.(2d) 228; 621 A.P.R. 228; 163 C.C.C.(3d) 177 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 83]. R. v. Hawkins (K.R.) and Morin (C.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; 204 N.R. 241; 96 O.A.C. 81; 111 C.C.C.(3d) 129, refd to. [para. R. v. Robertson (1975), 21 C.C.C.(2d) 385 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 103].......
-
R. v. Kirkpatrick
...v. The Queen, [1963] S.C.R. 651; R. v. Therens, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613; Chromiak v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 471; R. v. Hawkins, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; R. v. Hodgson, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 449; Friedmann Equity Developments Inc. v. Final Note Ltd., 2000 SCC 34, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 842; R. v. Prokofiew,......
-
R. v. Kelly (R.W.)
...1 S.C.R. 740; 148 N.R. 241; 61 O.A.C. 1; 79 C.C.C.(3d) 257; 19 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 65]. R. v. Hawkins (K.R.) and Morin (C.), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043; 204 N.R. 241; 96 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 66]. R. v. Woodcock (1788), 1 Leach 500; 168 E.R. 352, consd. [para. 70]. R. ex rel. Law v.......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (May 27 31, 2019)
...SCC 17, R. v. Suzack (2000), 141 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (Ont. C.A.), R. v. Parberry (2005), 202 C.C.C (3d) 337 (Ont. C.A.), R. V. Hawkins, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043, R. v. B. (K.G.), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 740, R. v. Devine, 2008 SCC 36, R. v. Khelawon, 2006 SCC 57, R. v. Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35, R. v. Couture,......
54 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...251 R. v. Harrison (1973), 12 C.C.C. (2d) 26 (Alta. Dist. Ct.) ................................ 253 R. v. Hawkins, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1043, 30 O.R. (3d) 641, 141 D.L.R. (4th) 193 .................................................................................................... 589 R. v. Hoff......
-
Table of cases
...Haughton , R v , 2004 CanLII 20182 (Ont CA) .............................. 623, 640, 651 Hawkins , R v , [1996] 3 SCR 1043 ........ 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 197, 240, 247, 521, 524 Hay , R v , 1982 CanLII 2516, 70 CCC (2d) 286 (Sask CA) ..............................207 Hay , R v , 201......
-
Hearsay
..., 2010 MBQB 81, aff’d 2012 MBCA 103, and R v Candir , 2009 ONCA 915. 85 Khelawon , above note 4 at para 49. 86 See R v Hawkins , [1996] 3 SCR 1043 [ Hawkins ], and Khelawon , above note 4 at paras 50–52. 87 Hawkins , above note 86 at para 75. 88 See Khelawon, above note 4 at para 93. 89 See......
-
Table of cases
...CR (4th) 286, [1992] NJ No 147 (CA) ................................................................................ 236 R v Hawkins, [1996] 3 SCR 1043, 111 CCC (3d) 129, [1996] SCJ No 117 .........409 R v Hayes (2003), 65 OR (3d) 787, 177 CCC (3d) 543, [2003] OJ No 2795 (CA) ....................
Get Started for Free