R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise |
| Citation | 2005 SCC 76,[2005] 3 SCR 609,136 CRR (2d) 121,EYB 2005-98899,49 BCLR (4th) 1,JE 2006-62,[2006] BCWLD 87,342 NR 259,260 DLR (4th) 411,[2006] 4 WWR 605,202 CCC (3d) 449,[2005] ACS no 76,33 CR (6th) 215,376 AR 1,219 BCAC 1,[2005] CarswellBC 2972,67 WCB (2d) 809,360 WAC 1,[2005] SCJ No 76 (QL) |
| Date | 15 December 2005 |
| Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE |
| Docket Number | 29952, 29953 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
232 practice notes
-
Fraser et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2011] N.R. TBEd. AP.052
... [2010] 1 S.C.R. 815 ; 402 N.R. 350 ; 262 O.A.C. 258 ; 2010 SCC 23 , refd to. [paras. 46, 193]. R. v. Henry (D.B.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; 342 N.R. 259 ; 376 A.R. 1 ; 360 W.A.C. 1 ; 219 B.C.A.C. 1 ; 361 W.A.C. 1 ; 2005 SCC 76 , refd to. [paras. 58, 130]. Haig et al. v. Canada;......
-
Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie‑Britannique v. British Columbia, 2020 SCC 13
...2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Reference re Public Schools Act (Man.), s. 79(3), (4) and (7), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 839; R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 768; Solski (Tutor of) v.......
-
Bilodeau-Massé c. Canada (Procureur général),
...and is inconsistent with the basic fundamental principle that the common law develops by experience” (R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 [at paragraph 57]), this Court nevertheless raised, on its own initiative, the question of the Federal Court’s jurisdiction to re......
-
Bell Canada c. 7262591 Canada Ltd.,
...CANADA LTD.[35] In considering the effect of Cogeco, guidance can be found in the principle expressed in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 (Henry), at paragraph 53, citing Quinn v. Leathem, [1901] A.C. 495 (H.L.), that “‘a case is only an authority for what it actu......
Request a trial to view additional results
210 cases
-
Fraser et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2011] N.R. TBEd. AP.052
... [2010] 1 S.C.R. 815 ; 402 N.R. 350 ; 262 O.A.C. 258 ; 2010 SCC 23 , refd to. [paras. 46, 193]. R. v. Henry (D.B.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; 342 N.R. 259 ; 376 A.R. 1 ; 360 W.A.C. 1 ; 219 B.C.A.C. 1 ; 361 W.A.C. 1 ; 2005 SCC 76 , refd to. [paras. 58, 130]. Haig et al. v. Canada;......
-
Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie‑Britannique v. British Columbia, 2020 SCC 13
...2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Reference re Public Schools Act (Man.), s. 79(3), (4) and (7), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 839; R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 768; Solski (Tutor of) v.......
-
Bilodeau-Massé c. Canada (Procureur général),
...and is inconsistent with the basic fundamental principle that the common law develops by experience” (R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 [at paragraph 57]), this Court nevertheless raised, on its own initiative, the question of the Federal Court’s jurisdiction to re......
-
Bell Canada c. 7262591 Canada Ltd.,
...CANADA LTD.[35] In considering the effect of Cogeco, guidance can be found in the principle expressed in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 (Henry), at paragraph 53, citing Quinn v. Leathem, [1901] A.C. 495 (H.L.), that “‘a case is only an authority for what it actu......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals from the Court of Appeal - Revised Version (December 2012)
...become available to the Commissioner, Feldman J.A. noted that pursuant to the Supreme Court's decisions in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 and the recent case of R. v. Nedelcu, 2012 SCC 59, the use immunity protection provided by s. 13 of the Charter is reserved for previously......
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals from the Court of Appeal (December 2012)
...become available to the Commissioner, Feldman J.A. noted that pursuant to the Supreme Court's decisions in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 and the recent case of R. v. Nedelcu, 2012 SCC 59, the use immunity protection provided by s. 13 of the Charter is reserved for previously......
-
'Stare Decisis' And Constitutional Supremacy: Will Our Charter Past Become An Obstacle To Our Charter Future?
...militate in favour of upholding this past decision. As Binnie J. stated on behalf of a unanimous Court in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609, "[t]he Court should be particularly careful before reversing a precedent where the effect is to diminish Charter protection" (para. 44). J......
-
R. V. G.T.D.: The Supreme Court Of Canada Decides A Charter Case From The Bench Again
...appeals from the bench than it did a decade ago. Is this a problem? Time will tell. As the Court noted in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609, the Supreme Court of Canada is responsible not just for correcting errors, but also for stewarding the development of jurisprudence: Hen......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 books & journal articles
-
Self-Incrimination
...inherent dignity of individuals. 2 It is also about the abuse of state power and the risk that compelling accused persons 1 R v Henry , [2005] 3 SCR 609 at para 2 [ Henry ]. 2 R v D’Amour (2002), 4 CR (6th) 275 (Ont CA) at para 35 [ D’Amour ]. 382 Self-Incrimination 383 to respond can produ......
-
Table of Cases
...275 R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 15 .......................................................................... 459 R. v. Henry, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609, 2005 SCC 76 .................................................. 425 R. v. Howard, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 299, 115 D.L.R. (4th) 312, 166 N.R. 282 ..........
-
Rights in the Criminal Process
...against self-incrimination by trying to have the accused adopt incriminating parts of his prior testimony. 169 R v Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 SCR 609 THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 346 an accused chooses to testify at his retrial. In such circumstances, the accused is not being compel......
-
Rights in the Criminal Process
...had violated the right against self-incrimination by trying to have the accused adopt incriminating parts of his prior testimony. 153 [2005] 3 SCR 609 [ Henry ]. THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 330 In R v Nedulcu , 154 a divided Court appeared to return to the approach taken in Kuldip by......
Request a trial to view additional results