R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise
Citation2005 SCC 76,[2005] 3 SCR 609,136 CRR (2d) 121,EYB 2005-98899,49 BCLR (4th) 1,JE 2006-62,[2006] BCWLD 87,342 NR 259,260 DLR (4th) 411,[2006] 4 WWR 605,202 CCC (3d) 449,[2005] ACS no 76,33 CR (6th) 215,376 AR 1,219 BCAC 1,[2005] CarswellBC 2972,67 WCB (2d) 809,360 WAC 1,[2005] SCJ No 76 (QL)
Date15 December 2005
Subject MatterCIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE
Docket Number29952, 29953
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
232 practice notes
  • Fraser et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2011] N.R. TBEd. AP.052
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 17, 2009
    ... [2010] 1 S.C.R. 815 ; 402 N.R. 350 ; 262 O.A.C. 258 ; 2010 SCC 23 , refd to. [paras. 46, 193]. R. v. Henry (D.B.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; 342 N.R. 259 ; 376 A.R. 1 ; 360 W.A.C. 1 ; 219 B.C.A.C. 1 ; 361 W.A.C. 1 ; 2005 SCC 76 , refd to. [paras. 58, 130]. Haig et al. v. Canada;......
  • Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie‑Britannique v. British Columbia, 2020 SCC 13
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 12, 2020
    ...2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Reference re Public Schools Act (Man.), s. 79(3), (4) and (7), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 839; R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 768; Solski (Tutor of) v.......
  • Bilodeau-Massé c. Canada (Procureur général),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 19, 2017
    ...and is inconsistent with the basic fundamental principle that the common law develops by experience” (R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 [at paragraph 57]), this Court nevertheless raised, on its own initiative, the question of the Federal Court’s jurisdiction to re......
  • Bell Canada c. 7262591 Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 1, 2018
    ...CANADA LTD.[35] In considering the effect of Cogeco, guidance can be found in the principle expressed in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 (Henry), at paragraph 53, citing Quinn v. Leathem, [1901] A.C. 495 (H.L.), that “‘a case is only an authority for what it actu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
210 cases
  • Fraser et al. v. Ontario (Attorney General), [2011] N.R. TBEd. AP.052
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • December 17, 2009
    ... [2010] 1 S.C.R. 815 ; 402 N.R. 350 ; 262 O.A.C. 258 ; 2010 SCC 23 , refd to. [paras. 46, 193]. R. v. Henry (D.B.) et al., [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; 342 N.R. 259 ; 376 A.R. 1 ; 360 W.A.C. 1 ; 219 B.C.A.C. 1 ; 361 W.A.C. 1 ; 2005 SCC 76 , refd to. [paras. 58, 130]. Haig et al. v. Canada;......
  • Conseil scolaire francophone de la Colombie‑Britannique v. British Columbia, 2020 SCC 13
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 12, 2020
    ...2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011 SCC 20, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 3; R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609; Reference re Public Schools Act (Man.), s. 79(3), (4) and (7), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 839; R. v. Beaulac, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 768; Solski (Tutor of) v.......
  • Bilodeau-Massé c. Canada (Procureur général),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • June 19, 2017
    ...and is inconsistent with the basic fundamental principle that the common law develops by experience” (R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 [at paragraph 57]), this Court nevertheless raised, on its own initiative, the question of the Federal Court’s jurisdiction to re......
  • Bell Canada c. 7262591 Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • October 1, 2018
    ...CANADA LTD.[35] In considering the effect of Cogeco, guidance can be found in the principle expressed in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 (Henry), at paragraph 53, citing Quinn v. Leathem, [1901] A.C. 495 (H.L.), that “‘a case is only an authority for what it actu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 firm's commentaries
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals from the Court of Appeal - Revised Version (December 2012)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 3, 2013
    ...become available to the Commissioner, Feldman J.A. noted that pursuant to the Supreme Court's decisions in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 and the recent case of R. v. Nedelcu, 2012 SCC 59, the use immunity protection provided by s. 13 of the Charter is reserved for previously......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals from the Court of Appeal (December 2012)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 20, 2012
    ...become available to the Commissioner, Feldman J.A. noted that pursuant to the Supreme Court's decisions in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609 and the recent case of R. v. Nedelcu, 2012 SCC 59, the use immunity protection provided by s. 13 of the Charter is reserved for previously......
  • 'Stare Decisis' And Constitutional Supremacy: Will Our Charter Past Become An Obstacle To Our Charter Future?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 21, 2013
    ...militate in favour of upholding this past decision. As Binnie J. stated on behalf of a unanimous Court in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609, "[t]he Court should be particularly careful before reversing a precedent where the effect is to diminish Charter protection" (para. 44). J......
  • R. V. G.T.D.: The Supreme Court Of Canada Decides A Charter Case From The Bench — Again
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 6, 2018
    ...appeals from the bench — than it did a decade ago. Is this a problem? Time will tell. As the Court noted in R. v. Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609, the Supreme Court of Canada is responsible not just for correcting errors, but also for stewarding the development of jurisprudence: Hen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 books & journal articles
  • Self-Incrimination
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • June 25, 2020
    ...inherent dignity of individuals. 2 It is also about the abuse of state power and the risk that compelling accused persons 1 R v Henry , [2005] 3 SCR 609 at para 2 [ Henry ]. 2 R v D’Amour (2002), 4 CR (6th) 275 (Ont CA) at para 35 [ D’Amour ]. 382 Self-Incrimination 383 to respond can produ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Constitutional Law. Fifth Edition Conclusion
    • August 3, 2017
    ...275 R. v. Hebert, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 15 .......................................................................... 459 R. v. Henry, [2005] 3 S.C.R. 609, 2005 SCC 76 .................................................. 425 R. v. Howard, [1994] 2 S.C.R. 299, 115 D.L.R. (4th) 312, 166 N.R. 282 ..........
  • Rights in the Criminal Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Seventh Edition
    • June 30, 2021
    ...against self-incrimination by trying to have the accused adopt incriminating parts of his prior testimony. 169 R v Henry, 2005 SCC 76, [2005] 3 SCR 609 THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 346 an accused chooses to testify at his retrial. In such circumstances, the accused is not being compel......
  • Rights in the Criminal Process
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Sixth Edition
    • June 22, 2021
    ...had violated the right against self-incrimination by trying to have the accused adopt incriminating parts of his prior testimony. 153 [2005] 3 SCR 609 [ Henry ]. THE CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS 330 In R v Nedulcu , 154 a divided Court appeared to return to the approach taken in Kuldip by......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT