R. v. Hobeika,

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeDoherty, van Rensburg and Trotter JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2020 ONCA 750
Docket NumberC64993 & C65025
Citation2020 ONCA 750
Date26 November 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Keshavarz,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 21 Abril 2022
    ...are cases where s. 10(b) breaches that are longer than the one hour in this case have not led to s. 24(2) exclusion: see R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, 153 O.R. (3d) 350, at para. 90; Griffith, at para. 80; and Pileggi, at paras. 4, 128. [122]   Some may wonder about the result for......
  • R. v. Kanneh,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Septiembre 2022
    ...24(2), even though it was not systemic or part of a pattern of intentional police misconduct:  Griffith, at para. 67; R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, at para. 82; Buchanan, at para. Impact of the Breach on the Applicant’s Charter-Protected Interests [144]     &......
  • R. v. Nguyen,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 12 Septiembre 2022
    ...2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 202 at paras. 33 and 37. [72]           In R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, Doherty J.A. stated at para. The urgency component of s. 11(7), as described in Patterson, was made out if, when the officer in c......
  • R. v. Brown,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 20 Abril 2022
    ...and whether they reasonably believed that waiting for a warrant would put the preservation of evidence in jeopardy: R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, at paras. 43 and [98]           After the arrest of Jomal Brown, the seizure of drugs from him ......
5 cases
  • R. v. Keshavarz,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 21 Abril 2022
    ...are cases where s. 10(b) breaches that are longer than the one hour in this case have not led to s. 24(2) exclusion: see R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, 153 O.R. (3d) 350, at para. 90; Griffith, at para. 80; and Pileggi, at paras. 4, 128. [122]   Some may wonder about the result for......
  • R. v. Kanneh,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 22 Septiembre 2022
    ...24(2), even though it was not systemic or part of a pattern of intentional police misconduct:  Griffith, at para. 67; R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, at para. 82; Buchanan, at para. Impact of the Breach on the Applicant’s Charter-Protected Interests [144]     &......
  • R. v. Nguyen,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 12 Septiembre 2022
    ...2017 SCC 15, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 202 at paras. 33 and 37. [72]           In R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, Doherty J.A. stated at para. The urgency component of s. 11(7), as described in Patterson, was made out if, when the officer in c......
  • R v Manna-Silva & George,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 8 Marzo 2024
    ...access to counsel was less significant than in other cases in which evidence has been excluded: see for example R. v. Hobeika, 2020 ONCA 750, 153 O.R. (3d) 350, where the delay was over 4 hours; Griffith, where the delay was 3 hours and 45 minutes; and R. v. Pileggi, 2021 ONCA 4, 153 O.R. (......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT