R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Richards C.J.S., Schwann and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 23 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 16 February 2021 |
| Docket Number | CACR3291 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 practice notes
-
R v D.B.,
...a trial judge’s reasons are insufficient in a case that turns on witness credibility were canvassed by Schwann J.A. in R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 [79] It is an error of law for a trial judge to fail to provide an explanation for their decision that is &#x......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [12] &......
-
R v Van Deventer,
...judge cannot reject an accused’s testimony solely because it is inconsistent with the Crown’s evidence: see R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 at para 98; R v Libertore, 2010 NSCA 82 at paras 11–12, 262 CCC (3d) 559 [Libertore]); and Vuradin at paras 21 and 26. [2......
-
R v John,
...the sufficiency of the trial judge’s reasons. The law with respect to insufficient reasons was recently expressed in R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 [Hoskins]: [79] It is an error of law for a trial judge to fail to provide an explanation for their decision that is “sufficiently int......
Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
-
R v D.B.,
...a trial judge’s reasons are insufficient in a case that turns on witness credibility were canvassed by Schwann J.A. in R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 [79] It is an error of law for a trial judge to fail to provide an explanation for their decision that is &#x......
-
R. v. F.I.,
...in R v Mehari, 2020 SKCA 37, 387 CCC (3d) 147, rev’d 2020 SCC 40; R v M.G.S., 2021 SKCA 1; R v Dirksen, 2021 SKCA 6; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 and R v Paproski, 2021 SKCA [12] &......
-
R v Van Deventer,
...judge cannot reject an accused’s testimony solely because it is inconsistent with the Crown’s evidence: see R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 at para 98; R v Libertore, 2010 NSCA 82 at paras 11–12, 262 CCC (3d) 559 [Libertore]); and Vuradin at paras 21 and 26. [2......
-
R v John,
...the sufficiency of the trial judge’s reasons. The law with respect to insufficient reasons was recently expressed in R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 [Hoskins]: [79] It is an error of law for a trial judge to fail to provide an explanation for their decision that is “sufficiently int......
Request a trial to view additional results