R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Case Date | November 30, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Citations | 2016 MBCA 121 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 practice notes
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 18-22, 2019)
...of Justice, Subpoenas, Collateral Attack, Criminal Code, ss. 139(2) and 700(2), R. v. Pastro (1988), 66 Sask. R. 241 (C.A.), R. v. Houle, 2016 MBCA 121, R. v. Bird, 2019 SCC 7 v. Reyes, 2019 ONCA 231 Keywords: Criminal Law, Appeals, Perfection, Bench Warrants Ontario Review Board Scalabrini......
-
GENERAL AND SPECIFIC INTENT: THE QUIET DEATH OF THE SUBSTANTIVE UNDERSTANDING.
..."Sullivan. Specific and General Intent be Damned: Volition Missing and Mens Rea Incomplete" (2020) 63:7 CR (7th) 164. (41) R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 at para 6. See also R v Brewer, 2016 BCSC 1291 at para (42) R v Desjarlais, 2016 ABPC 182 para 128. (43) George, supra note 20. (44) Ibid at 87......
-
R. v. JED, 2018 MBCA 123
...of the evidence which had an impact on the sentence, or the imposition of a sentence which is demonstrably unfit. [36] As R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 explains (at para A material error has two qualities beginning with demonstration of an error in principle, such as an error in law, a failure t......
-
R v Dyck, 2018 MBCA 33
...most recent admonitions being in R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64. Mainella JA, for this Court, explained that standard as follows in R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 (at para 11): The law affords a sentencing judge great latitude in tailoring a sentence to the offence and the offender (R v Ipeelee, 2012 S......
Request a trial to view additional results
26 cases
-
R. v. JED, 2018 MBCA 123
...of the evidence which had an impact on the sentence, or the imposition of a sentence which is demonstrably unfit. [36] As R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 explains (at para A material error has two qualities beginning with demonstration of an error in principle, such as an error in law, a failure t......
-
R v Dyck, 2018 MBCA 33
...most recent admonitions being in R v Lacasse, 2015 SCC 64. Mainella JA, for this Court, explained that standard as follows in R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 (at para 11): The law affords a sentencing judge great latitude in tailoring a sentence to the offence and the offender (R v Ipeelee, 2012 S......
-
R v Burnett, 2017 MBCA 122
...and general deterrence.[18] The accused argues that the appeal should be dismissed on the basis of the standard of review (see R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 at para 11). He submits that great deference is owed to the sentencing judge’s finding of exceptional circumstances and that such a finding......
-
R v SJB, 2018 MBCA 62
...Discussion Standard of Review [16] The standard of review on a sentence appeal is well known and was stated as follows in R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 (at para 11): The law affords a sentencing judge great latitude in tailoring a sentence to the offence and the offender (R v Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 1......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 18-22, 2019)
...of Justice, Subpoenas, Collateral Attack, Criminal Code, ss. 139(2) and 700(2), R. v. Pastro (1988), 66 Sask. R. 241 (C.A.), R. v. Houle, 2016 MBCA 121, R. v. Bird, 2019 SCC 7 v. Reyes, 2019 ONCA 231 Keywords: Criminal Law, Appeals, Perfection, Bench Warrants Ontario Review Board Scalabrini......
1 books & journal articles
-
GENERAL AND SPECIFIC INTENT: THE QUIET DEATH OF THE SUBSTANTIVE UNDERSTANDING.
..."Sullivan. Specific and General Intent be Damned: Volition Missing and Mens Rea Incomplete" (2020) 63:7 CR (7th) 164. (41) R v Houle, 2016 MBCA 121 at para 6. See also R v Brewer, 2016 BCSC 1291 at para (42) R v Desjarlais, 2016 ABPC 182 para 128. (43) George, supra note 20. (44) Ibid at 87......