R v Howell, 2020 ABQB 385
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice Robert A. Graesser |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 385 |
| Docket Number | 170341762Q1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 26 June 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
2025 BCSC 57,
...sold by licensed producers to patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow ......
-
Sikora v Deputy Director Community Safety Unit,
...sold by licensed producers to patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow ......
-
R v Seeman,
...The Crown commends to me R v Howell, 2020 ABQB 385, 463 CRR (2d) 282 [Howell], a case similar to the one before me. The judge in Howell granted a declaration that s. 67(1) (limiting concentrations) and ss. 93(1)(d)(i), 133(2)(a), 130(1)(b) and 189(1)(e) (to the extent they prohibit distribu......
3 cases
-
2025 BCSC 57,
...sold by licensed producers to patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow ......
-
Sikora v Deputy Director Community Safety Unit,
...sold by licensed producers to patients at brick-and-mortar storefront locations: R. v. Ferkul, 2019 ONCJ 893 at paras. 2–3; R v. Howell, 2020 ABQB 385; R. v. Chartrand, 2020 NSPC 26; and R. v. Enns, 2019 NSSC 323. The petitioners in oral submissions stated that, while they generally follow ......
-
R v Seeman,
...The Crown commends to me R v Howell, 2020 ABQB 385, 463 CRR (2d) 282 [Howell], a case similar to the one before me. The judge in Howell granted a declaration that s. 67(1) (limiting concentrations) and ss. 93(1)(d)(i), 133(2)(a), 130(1)(b) and 189(1)(e) (to the extent they prohibit distribu......