R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7
Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
Judge | James L. Chipman |
Citation | 2019 NSSC 7 |
Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
Date | 11 January 2019 |
Docket Number | 464560 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Gardner and Fraser,
...(a pilot); R. v. Wood, supra (an engineer); R. v. Harshbarger, supra (a hunter); R. v. Swanney, 2006 BCSC 1766 (a doctor); R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7 (a [71] In this case, the Crown did not tender expert evidence about the standard of care of a reasonable and prudent Booking Officer. That om......
-
R v Hoyeck, 2020 NSPC 24
...Crown had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he had done, or omitted to do anything, that caused Mr. Kempton’s death (R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7). Victim Impact [17] Mr. Kempton’s two adult daughters, Shannon Kempton and Carinna Ladouceur, submitted victim impact statements. They also......
-
R. v. Gardner,
...a significant contributory cause of his death. In this regard, I find similarities with the causation analysis I set out in R. v. Hoyek, 2019 NSSC 7: [68] In determining whether a person can be held responsible for causing death, it must be determined whether t......
-
Monday’s Mix
...I found there were two very interesting facets to it that warranted bringing to the attention of members in Manitoba. R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7 concerns an employer who was charged with failing to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to an employee. The trial began before a judge an......
3 cases
-
R. v. Gardner and Fraser,
...(a pilot); R. v. Wood, supra (an engineer); R. v. Harshbarger, supra (a hunter); R. v. Swanney, 2006 BCSC 1766 (a doctor); R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7 (a [71] In this case, the Crown did not tender expert evidence about the standard of care of a reasonable and prudent Booking Officer. That om......
-
R v Hoyeck, 2020 NSPC 24
...Crown had not proved beyond a reasonable doubt that he had done, or omitted to do anything, that caused Mr. Kempton’s death (R. v. Hoyeck, 2019 NSSC 7). Victim Impact [17] Mr. Kempton’s two adult daughters, Shannon Kempton and Carinna Ladouceur, submitted victim impact statements. They also......
-
R. v. Gardner,
...a significant contributory cause of his death. In this regard, I find similarities with the causation analysis I set out in R. v. Hoyek, 2019 NSSC 7: [68] In determining whether a person can be held responsible for causing death, it must be determined whether t......