R. v. Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeF.M. DAUNT, J.
Citation2020 SKPC 8
Date14 February 2020
CourtProvincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Docket Number991086264
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • R. v Charles,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...information.”  As defence counsel points out, this is substantially the same boiler-plate clause as was used in R v Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8, which was also a Prince Albert SET case.  Paragraph 6 is obviously in the template into which Constable Mesenchuk was plugging informati......
  • R. v. Hussein, 2020 SKPC 11
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 28 Febrero 2020
    ...[1]               After R v Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8 was finalized, but before it was delivered, Crown counsel filed a written brief. Most issues raised in the brief are answered in the judgment.  However, the brief did ......
  • R. v. RWIGEMA,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 18 Septiembre 2020
    ...The defence provided one authority, being a recent decision of Judge Daunt in R v Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8 [Hussein], where a warrant was granted on the basis that the officer received a tip that “an unknown black male is selling crack from Louisa Dorion’s place”. Ms. Dorio......
3 cases
  • R. v Charles,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...information.”  As defence counsel points out, this is substantially the same boiler-plate clause as was used in R v Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8, which was also a Prince Albert SET case.  Paragraph 6 is obviously in the template into which Constable Mesenchuk was plugging informati......
  • R. v. Hussein, 2020 SKPC 11
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 28 Febrero 2020
    ...[1]               After R v Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8 was finalized, but before it was delivered, Crown counsel filed a written brief. Most issues raised in the brief are answered in the judgment.  However, the brief did ......
  • R. v. RWIGEMA,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 18 Septiembre 2020
    ...The defence provided one authority, being a recent decision of Judge Daunt in R v Hussein, 2020 SKPC 8 [Hussein], where a warrant was granted on the basis that the officer received a tip that “an unknown black male is selling crack from Louisa Dorion’s place”. Ms. Dorio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT