R. v. Hynes
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; L'Heureux-Dubé, Claire; Gonthier, Charles Doherty; Iacobucci, Frank; Major, John C.; Bastarache, Michel; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; Arbour, Louise; LeBel, Louis |
| Citation | 2001 SCC 82,[2001] 3 SCR 623,88 CRR (2d) 222,208 Nfld & PEIR 181,278 NR 299,51 WCB (2d) 453,624 APR 181,JE 2002-10,206 DLR (4th) 483,[2001] SCJ No 80 (QL),159 CCC (3d) 359,47 CR (5th) 278,[2001] CarswellNfld 316 |
| Docket Number | 27443 |
| Date | 06 December 2001 |
| Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,EVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
172 practice notes
-
M.M. v. Canada (Minister of Justice)
...grant Charter remedies that pertain directly to the circumscribed issues relevant to committal: see, e.g., R. v. Hynes , 2001 SCC 82, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; United States of America v. Kwok , 2001 SCC 18, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 532. The second is that the extradition judge, unlike the preliminary in......
-
R. v. Harrison (B.)
...121 N.R. 161; 61 C.C.C.(3d) 207 (S.C.C.), consd. [para. 149]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.) (2001), 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 159 C.C.C.(3d) 359 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Olmstead v. United States of America (1928), 277 U.S. 438 (U.S.S.C.), consd. [para. 162]. R. v. C......
-
M.M. v. United States of America
...1 S.C.R. 679; United States of America v. Dynar, [1997] 2 S.C.R. 462; McVey (Re), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 475; R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; United States of America v. Kwok, 2001 SCC 18, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 532; R. v. Sazant, 2004 SCC 77, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 635; R. v. Russell, 2001 SCC 5......
-
Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 707 et al. v. Labour Relations Board (Alta.) et al., (2004) 351 A.R. 265 (QB)
...1; 26 C.C.C.(3d) 481; 29 D.L.R.(4th) 161; 21 C.R.R. 76; 1986 CarswellOnt 116, refd to. [para. 124, footnote 101]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.) [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 159 C.C.C.(3d) 359; 206 D.L.R.(4th) 483; 47 C.R.(5th) 278; 88 C.R.R.(2d) 222;......
Get Started for Free
117 cases
-
R. v. Harrison (B.)
...121 N.R. 161; 61 C.C.C.(3d) 207 (S.C.C.), consd. [para. 149]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.) (2001), 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 159 C.C.C.(3d) 359 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. Olmstead v. United States of America (1928), 277 U.S. 438 (U.S.S.C.), consd. [para. 162]. R. v. C......
-
Paul v. British Columbia (Forest Appeals Commission)
...and Research) v. Southam Inc., [1997] 1 S.C.R. 748; R. v. 974649 Ontario Inc., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575, 2001 SCC 81; R. v. Hynes, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623, 2001 SCC 82; Tétreault-Gadoury v. Canada (Employment and Immigration Commission), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 22; Mills v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 863; D......
-
R. v. Conway (P.)
...v. 974649 Ontario Inc. et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; 279 N.R. 345; 154 O.A.C. 345; 2001 SCC 81, refd to. [para. 4]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 2001 SCC 82, refd to. [para. R. v. Menard (P.L.) (2008), 263 B.C.A.C. 167; ......
-
R. v. Conway (P.)
...v. 974649 Ontario Inc. et al., [2001] 3 S.C.R. 575; 279 N.R. 345; 154 O.A.C. 345; 2001 SCC 81, refd to. [para. 4]. R. v. Hynes (D.W.), [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623; 278 N.R. 299; 208 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 181; 624 A.P.R. 181; 2001 SCC 82, refd to. [para. R. v. Menard (P.L.) (2008), 263 B.C.A.C. 167; ......
Get Started for Free
53 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...127 C.C.C. (3d) 449 .................................................................................... 272 R. v. Hynes, 2001 SCC 82, 159 C.C.C. (3d) 359, 206 D.L.R. (4th) 483 ............. 633 R. v. I.(L.R.), [1993] 4 S.C.R. 504, 109 D.L.R. (4th) 140, 86 C.C.C. (3d) 289 ........................
-
Table of Cases
...v Hundal, [1993] 1 SCR 867, 79 CCC (3d) 97 ................................................ 278 R v Hynes, [2001] 3 SCR 6232001 SCC 82, 206 DLR (4th) 483 ........................ 123 R v Jarvis, [2002] 3 SCR 757, 2002 SCC 73, 219 DLR (4th) 233 .................. 57 , 296 R v Johnson, [2003]......
-
Table of cases
...172 R v Huynh, 2010 BCSC 1306 ............................................................................. 385 R v Hynes, [2001] 3 SCR 623, 159 CCC (3d) 359, 2001 SCC 82 .......................................... 69, 389, 393, 396, 401, 403, 488, 498 R v I(SP) (2005), 27 CR (6th) 112, 193 ......
-
The Trial Process
...and tried without a jury, provided the Crown and accused both consent. 19 Clunas , above note 16. 20 Section 591(3). 21 R. v. Hynes , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 623 [ Hynes ]. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 332 injustice. 22 The former question looks at the circumstances at the time the ruling was made, while the......
Get Started for Free