R. v. I.M.
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Richard Wagner; Andromache Karakatsanis; Suzanne Côté; Malcolm Rowe; Sheilah Martin; Nicholas Kasirer; Mahmud Jamal; Michelle O’Bonsawin; Mary Moreau |
| Judgment Date | 18 July 2025 |
| Citation | 2025 SCC 23 |
| Docket Number | 40868 |
| Date | 18 July 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 practice notes
-
R. v. Wilson
...2014 SCC 77, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 621; R. v. Stairs, 2022 SCC 11, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 169; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; R. v. I.M., 2025 SCC 23; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37, [2021] 2 S.C.R. 948; R. v. Morgentaler, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 463; 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Associatio......
-
R. v. Hussein
...v. Duke, 123 A.2d 745 (N.H. 1956); R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. I.M., 2025 SCC 23; R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. I.T., 2024 ONSC 6176; R. v. Morris, 2021 ONCA 680, 159 ......
-
R. v. S.B.
...determine when a young person should be sentenced as an adult pursuant to s. 72 of the YCJA are set out in the companion case, R. v. I.M., 2025 SCC 23. B’s case is governed by that same framework. The Court of Appeal erred in law when sentencing afresh by failing to apply the constitutional......
-
Chief Electoral Officer of Alberta v. Sylvestre
...Morris International, Inc, 2018 SCC 36 at para 17. To do this, a court must consider the text, context, and purpose of a statute: R v IM, 2025 SCC 23 at para 82. A court must start its analysis by looking to the words that the Legislative Assembly used: R v Wolfe, 2024 SCC 34 at para 32. Wh......
Get Started for Free
14 cases
-
R. v. Hussein
...v. Duke, 123 A.2d 745 (N.H. 1956); R. v. Williams, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 1128; R. v. Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; R. v. I.M., 2025 SCC 23; R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688; R. v. I.T., 2024 ONSC 6176; R. v. Morris, 2021 ONCA 680, 159 ......
-
R. v. Wilson
...2014 SCC 77, [2014] 3 S.C.R. 621; R. v. Stairs, 2022 SCC 11, [2022] 1 S.C.R. 169; R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 692; R. v. I.M., 2025 SCC 23; R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37, [2021] 2 S.C.R. 948; R. v. Morgentaler, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 463; 1704604 Ontario Ltd. v. Pointes Protection Associatio......
-
R. v. S.B.
...determine when a young person should be sentenced as an adult pursuant to s. 72 of the YCJA are set out in the companion case, R. v. I.M., 2025 SCC 23. B’s case is governed by that same framework. The Court of Appeal erred in law when sentencing afresh by failing to apply the constitutional......
-
Resler v. Anglin
...6; Piekut v. Canada (National Revenue), 2025 SCC 13; TELUS Communications Inc. v. Wellman, 2019 SCC 19, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 144; R. v. I.M., 2025 SCC 23; Ahluwalia v. Ahluwalia, 2026 SCC 16; Friedmann Equity Developments Inc. v. Final Note Ltd., 2000 SCC 34, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 842; Law v. Canada (......
Get Started for Free
