R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd.,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Deschamps, Marie; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert |
| Citation | 2011 SCC 42,[2011] 3 SCR 45,[2011] ACS no 42,25 Admin LR (5th) 1,83 CBR (5th) 169,[2011] SCJ No 42 (QL),335 DLR (4th) 513,86 CCLT (3d) 1,419 NR 1,21 BCLR (5th) 215,205 ACWS (3d) 92,[2011] EXP 2380,[2011] 11 WWR 215,[2011] CarswellBC 1986,JE 2011-1326,308 BCAC 1 |
| Date | 29 July 2011 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Docket Number | 33559, 33563 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
722 practice notes
-
Ernst v. EnCana Corp. et al.,
...132; 398 N.R. 20; 474 A.R. 1; 479 W.A.C. 1; 2010 SCC 5, refd to. [para. 19]. British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. et al., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; 419 N.R. 1; 308 B.C.A.C. 1; 521 W.A.C. 1; 2011 SCC 42, refd to. [para. Nette v. Stiles et al. (2010), 489 A.R. 347; 2010 ABQB 14, refd to......
-
Gay v. Regional Health Authority 7 et al.,
...23 (Sup. Ct.), affd. (2001), 152 O.A.C. 60 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 181]. British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. et al., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; 419 N.R. 1; 308 B.C.A.C. 1; 521 W.A.C. 1; 2011 SCC 42, refd to. [para. 184]. Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728 (H.L.), r......
-
Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey,
...Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company, 2013 SCC 58 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 545 ; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42 , [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; R. c. Proulx, 2016 QCCA 1425 ; Proprietary Articles Trade Association v. Attorney General for Canada, [1931] A.C. 310; International Brotherh......
-
Iris Technologies Inc. v. Canada,
...Labour Relations Board, 2013 FCA 117; Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; Abraham v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FCA 266, 440 N.R. 201; Abou‑Rached v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 750, 2019 D.T.C. 506......
Get Started for Free
637 cases
-
Nelson (City) v. Marchi,
...Applied: R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42 , [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; Just v. British Columbia, [1989] 2 S.C.R. 1228 ; Cooper v. Hobart, 2001 SCC 79 , [2001] 3 S.C.R. 537 ; Anns v. Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728 ; referred to: Donoghue v. Stevenson, [1932] A.C......
-
Paradis Honey Ltd. et al. v. Canada (Attorney General),
...Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728 ; [1977] UKHL 4 , refd to. [paras. 18, 88]. British Columbia v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. et al., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; 419 N.R. 1 ; 308 B.C.A.C. 1 ; 521 W.A.C. 1 ; 2011 SCC 42 , consd. [paras. 23, 87]. Bauer Hockey Corp. v. Sport Maska Inc. (2014), ......
-
Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya,
...2002 SCC 1, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3; India v. Badesha, 2017 SCC 44, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 127; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 263; Operation Dismantle v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 441; Willow v. Chong, 2013......
-
R v Haevischer,
...R. v. Kuntz-Angel, 2020 BCSC 1777; R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45; Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87; R. v. Glegg, 2021 ONCA 100, 400 C.C.C. (3d) 276; R. v. Samaniego, 2022 SCC 9; R. v. Edw......
Get Started for Free
18 firm's commentaries
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 17 21, 2018)
...to Strike, Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121, 136 O.R. (3d) 654, R. v. Imperial Tobacco, 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45, Reasonable Prospect of Success, Tolofson v. Jensen, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022 Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Canada (Attorney General)......
-
Hail To The Chief: McLachlin C.J.C. Becomes Canadas Longest-Serving Chief Justice
...1 S.C.R. 643, Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 129 and R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45 - and has consistently been the driving force behind the Court's clarification of these important Resurfice and Clements Two appropriate co......
-
Defence & Indemnity - An Analysis of Insurance Case Law and Legislation - April 2017
...reasons why this prima facie duty of care should not be recognized.” (R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42 (CanLII) at para 39, [2011] 3 SCR 45).” c) The appellants argued that the Pet Rules, which re- quired the tenant to do certain things with respect to pets, created a duty of c......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 12 16, 2017)
...true, it is plain and obvious that the claim has no reasonable prospect of success per R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45, at para. 17. Furthermore, whether the cause of action requirement is met is reviewable on a correctness standard of review per Attis v.......
Get Started for Free
52 books & journal articles
-
Digest: "A" v R, 2018 SKQB 103
...SKQB 163, [2004] 1 WWR 309, 234 Sask R 172 R v Anderson, 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 SCR 167 R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 SCR 45, 335 DLR (4th) 513, 419 NR 1, [2011] 11 WWR 215, 308 BCAC 1, 86 CCLT (3d) 1, 83 CBR (5th) 169 R v K.G.B., [1993] 1 SCR 740, 148 NR 241, 79 CC......
-
The Claim Must Have Substantial Merit
...is a standard that this Court has also used to animate the “plain and obvious” test ( R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. , 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45, at paras. 17-20). In light of the existence of a record, the substantial merit standard calls for an assessment of the evidentiary basi......
-
Digest: T & C Arndt Minerals Ltd. v Silver Spur Resources Ltd., 2018 SKQB 337
...469 Sask R 15 Plotnikoff v Saskatchewan, 2004 SKCA 59, [2005] 3 WWR 257, 249 Sask R 42 R v Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 SCR 45, 335 DLR (4th) 513, 419 NR 1, [2011] 11 WWR 215, 308 BCAC 1, 86 CCLT (3d) 1, 83 CBR (5th) 169 Raymond v Raymond, 2015 SKQB 164, [2015] 11 WWR......
Get Started for Free