R v Ippak, 2018 NUCA 3
| Docket Number | 08-15-001-CAP |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Ronald Berger; The Honourable Mr. Justice Thomas W. Wakeling; The Honourable Madam Justice Frederica Schutz |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Case Date | June 19, 2018 |
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Citations | 2018 NUCA 3 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
R. v. Gill, 2021 BCSC 377
...deliberate flouting of established Charter standards, an aggravating factor under Grant. By reference to the decision in R v. Ippak, 2018 NUCA 3, the defence argues that such deliberate conduct necessarily places the conduct at the serious end of the spectrum. They further cite ......
-
UNDRIP AND THE RENEWED APPLICATION OF INDIGENOUS LAWS IN THE COMMON LAW.
...courts towards the assumption of Crown sovereignty, while subordinaring Indigenous law and governance wirhin the section 35 paradigm. (37) 2018 NUCA 3. (38) 2018 ONSC 7701 (39) 2018 FC 648. (40) R v Ippak, supra note 37 at para 84. (41) Ibid at para 103. (42) Ibid at para 99. (43) Restoule,......
-
Judicial Reasoning Across Legal Orders: Lessons from Nunavut.
...appeal of Bychok J's decision in Itturiligaq had been heard by the Nunavut Court of Appeal and its judgment was still under reserve. (11.) 2018 NUCA 3. (12.) Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 (13.) Willie Ermine, "The Ethical Spac......
-
R v Keller, 2019 ABCA 38
...or other officers of the Calgary Police Service, or any police policies or training that promoted such conduct: see in contrast R v Ippak, 2018 NUCA 3. [40] Further, while the appellant was arbitrarily detained and was not informed of his s 10(b) rights, no evidence directly flowed therefro......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
R. v. Gill, 2021 BCSC 377
...a deliberate flouting of established Charter standards, an aggravating factor under Grant. By reference to the decision in R v. Ippak, 2018 NUCA 3, the defence argues that such deliberate conduct necessarily places the conduct at the serious end of the spectrum. They further cite R v. Sti......
-
R v Keller, 2019 ABCA 38
...or other officers of the Calgary Police Service, or any police policies or training that promoted such conduct: see in contrast R v Ippak, 2018 NUCA 3. [40] Further, while the appellant was arbitrarily detained and was not informed of his s 10(b) rights, no evidence directly flowed therefro......
-
R v Vaillancourt, 2019 ABCA 317
...be more serious than an isolated incident: R v GTD, 2017 ABCA 274 at para 82, per Veldhuis JA in dissent, aff’d in 2018 SCC 7; R v Ippak, 2018 NUCA 3 at paras 39-43. First, we note that the trial judge did not specifically consider this point, and accordingly made no finding one way or anot......
1 books & journal articles
-
Judicial Reasoning Across Legal Orders: Lessons from Nunavut.
...appeal of Bychok J's decision in Itturiligaq had been heard by the Nunavut Court of Appeal and its judgment was still under reserve. (11.) 2018 NUCA 3. (12.) Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 (13.) Willie Ermine, "The Ethical Spac......