R. v. Isaac (S.), (2015) 469 Sask.R. 123 (QB)
| Judge | Tholl, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Case Date | Wednesday February 18, 2015 |
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Citations | (2015), 469 Sask.R. 123 (QB);2015 SKQB 46 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Saskatchewan Ministry of Social Services v. N.V.R.D., 2019 SKQB 302
...by various levels of courts. [39] In R v Isaac, 2015 SKQB 46, Tholl J. (as he then was) commented on the circumstances under which a previous decision of the same court would not be followed: [66] ......
-
R. v. Kelly (J.), 2015 CRM 48
...decisis requires that I be extremely cautious in departing from a previous decision of a judge of the same court. Tholl J. in R v Isaac , 2015 SKQB 46, explained the rationale for the doctrine of stare decisis: 63 The court cannot disregard its own previous decisions without proper justific......
2 cases
-
Saskatchewan Ministry of Social Services v. N.V.R.D., 2019 SKQB 302
...by various levels of courts. [39] In R v Isaac, 2015 SKQB 46, Tholl J. (as he then was) commented on the circumstances under which a previous decision of the same court would not be followed: [66] ......
-
R. v. Kelly (J.), 2015 CRM 48
...decisis requires that I be extremely cautious in departing from a previous decision of a judge of the same court. Tholl J. in R v Isaac , 2015 SKQB 46, explained the rationale for the doctrine of stare decisis: 63 The court cannot disregard its own previous decisions without proper justific......