R. v. Ismail

JurisdictionOntario
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
JudgePHILLIPS J.
Neutral Citation2021 ONSC 4426
Citation2021 ONSC 4426
Date21 June 2021
Docket NumberCR-19-6278

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • R v Benn
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 19, 2026
    ...that could fit possibly thousands of individuals” are of minimal evidentiary value and should be afforded little weight: R v Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426 at para 13; R v Foster, 2008 CanLII 8419 at para 40 (ONSC); R v Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77 at paras 5–8; R v Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434 at para 45; R v FA, ......
  • R v Gallagher
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 13, 2024
    ...as “that is the man”, can be an unsafe foundation for a conviction if other circumstances do not support that assertion: R. v. Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426 at paras. 46 The Crown refers to R. v. Aburto, 2008 BCCA 78, which involved both types of identification evidence in relation to an assault, ......
2 cases
  • R v Benn
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • January 19, 2026
    ...that could fit possibly thousands of individuals” are of minimal evidentiary value and should be afforded little weight: R v Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426 at para 13; R v Foster, 2008 CanLII 8419 at para 40 (ONSC); R v Ellis, 2008 ONCA 77 at paras 5–8; R v Keddy, 2022 ONCJ 434 at para 45; R v FA, ......
  • R v Gallagher
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • December 13, 2024
    ...as “that is the man”, can be an unsafe foundation for a conviction if other circumstances do not support that assertion: R. v. Ismail, 2021 ONSC 4426 at paras. 46 The Crown refers to R. v. Aburto, 2008 BCCA 78, which involved both types of identification evidence in relation to an assault, ......