R. v. J.J.P., 2020 YKCA 13

JurisdictionYukon
CourtCourt of Appeal (Yukon Territory)
JudgeThe Honourable Madam Justice MacKenzie,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch,The Honourable Madam Justice Fisher
Citation2020 YKCA 13
Date07 August 2020
Docket Number18‑YU828; 18‑YU829
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • R v Pelly,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Abril 2021
    ...a decision in a Part XXIV proceeding on a question of law: R v Natomagan, 2012 SKCA 46 at paras 49–52, [2012] 8 WWR 444, and R v J.J.P., 2020 YKCA 13 at paras 41–46, 390 CCC (3d) 513. [20] The applicable standard of review is summarized in R v Lawrence, 2019 BCCA 291, leave to appeal to SCC......
  • R v Natomagan,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 11 Febrero 2022
    ...Crown appeals under subsection 759(2). The Crown may appeal dangerous offender designations or sentences on grounds of law alone: R v JJP, 2020 YKCA 13 at paras 41-44.  Questions of law will be reviewed on a correctness standard: Boutilier at para 81. [85]     ......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 Marzo 2023
    ...prospects are so compelling as to raise a reasonable doubt about future violence or intractability is a question of fact ( R v J.J.P., 2020 YKCA 13 at para 68, 390 CCC 3(d) 513). As mentioned earlier, that means a trial judge's conclusion on that point is beyond the reach of appellate ......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 Marzo 2023
    ...prospects are so compelling as to raise a reasonable doubt about future violence or intractability is a question of fact (R v J.J.P., 2020 YKCA 13 at para 68, 390 CCC 3(d) 513). As mentioned earlier, that means a trial judge’s conclusion on that point is beyond the reach of appellate......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • R v Pelly,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 1 Abril 2021
    ...a decision in a Part XXIV proceeding on a question of law: R v Natomagan, 2012 SKCA 46 at paras 49–52, [2012] 8 WWR 444, and R v J.J.P., 2020 YKCA 13 at paras 41–46, 390 CCC (3d) 513. [20] The applicable standard of review is summarized in R v Lawrence, 2019 BCCA 291, leave to appeal to SCC......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 Marzo 2023
    ...prospects are so compelling as to raise a reasonable doubt about future violence or intractability is a question of fact ( R v J.J.P., 2020 YKCA 13 at para 68, 390 CCC 3(d) 513). As mentioned earlier, that means a trial judge's conclusion on that point is beyond the reach of appellate ......
  • R v Natomagan,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 11 Febrero 2022
    ...Crown appeals under subsection 759(2). The Crown may appeal dangerous offender designations or sentences on grounds of law alone: R v JJP, 2020 YKCA 13 at paras 41-44.  Questions of law will be reviewed on a correctness standard: Boutilier at para 81. [85]     ......
  • R v Bird,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 28 Marzo 2023
    ...prospects are so compelling as to raise a reasonable doubt about future violence or intractability is a question of fact (R v J.J.P., 2020 YKCA 13 at para 68, 390 CCC 3(d) 513). As mentioned earlier, that means a trial judge’s conclusion on that point is beyond the reach of appellate......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT