R. v. Janiten, (1985) 70 A.R. 214 (ProvCt)
Judge | Abbott, P.C.J. |
Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
Case Date | November 21, 1985 |
Citations | (1985), 70 A.R. 214 (ProvCt) |
R. v. Janiten (1985), 70 A.R. 214 (ProvCt)
MLB headnote and full text
R. v. Janiten
(Docket No. C017-079823-2A01)
Indexed As: R. v. Janiten
Alberta Provincial Court
Abbott, P.C.J.
November 21, 1985.
Summary:
The accused was charged with failing to provide a breath sample for roadside analysis, contrary to s. 234.1(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The Alberta Provincial Court acquitted the accused.
Criminal Law - Topic 1366
Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - "Drives" - Meaning of - Police in a parked car observed an accused drive up, park and walk towards them, all without showing signs of impairment - Only as he approached did they smell alcohol on his breath - The Alberta Provincial Court acquitted the accused on a charge of failing to provide a breath sample for roadside analysis, because the accused was not driving a motor vehicle, having completed his journey.
Criminal Law - Topic 1367
Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - "Care or control" - Meaning of - Police in a parked car observed an accused drive up, park and walk towards them, all without showing signs of impairment - Only as he approached did they smell alcohol on his breath - The Alberta Provincial Court acquitted the accused on a charge of failing to provide a breath sample for roadside analysis, because the accused did not have care or control of a motor vehicle, where he had completed his journey.
Criminal Law - Topic 1386.3
Motor vehicles - Impaired driving - Roadside screening test - Refusal or failure to provide breath sample - Police in a parked car observed the accused drive up, park and walk towards them, all without showing signs of impairment - Only as he approached did they smell alcohol on his breath - The accused was given an A.L.E.R.T. demand, but failed to provide a breath sample - The Alberta Provincial Court acquitted the accused on a charge under s. 234.1(2) of the Criminal Code, because the accused was neither driving nor had care or control of a motor vehicle, where he had completed his journey.
Cases Noticed:
R. v. Letkeman (1983), 28 Sask.R. 307; 24 M.V.R. 273, consd. [para. 5].
Edkins v. Knowles, [1973] Q.B. 748, consd. [para. 11].
Statutes Noticed:
Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1970, c. C-34, sect. 234.1(1) [paras. 4, 18].
Authors and Works Noticed:
Black's Law Dictionary [para. 6].
McLeod, Takach and Segal, Breathalyzer Law in Canada [para. 10]; pp. 2-10 [para. 11].
Counsel:
T.R. Follett, for the Crown;
D.F. Reay, for the accused.
This case was heard before Abbott, P.C.J., of the Alberta Provincial Court, whose decision was delivered orally on November 21, 1985.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
R. v. Fraser (M.L.), 2002 ABPC 52
...132 A.R. 71 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Burrell (1992), 9 W.C.B. 199 (Alta. Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Janiten (1985), 70 A.R. 214; 42 M.V.R. 109 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. R. v. Schmidt (D.) (2001), 211 Sask.R. 8 (Q.B.), folld. [para. 38]. R. v. Phillips (D.J.) (1......
-
R. v. Fraser (M.L.), 2002 ABPC 52
...132 A.R. 71 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Burrell (1992), 9 W.C.B. 199 (Alta. Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. 20]. R. v. Janiten (1985), 70 A.R. 214; 42 M.V.R. 109 (Prov. Ct.), refd to. [para. R. v. Schmidt (D.) (2001), 211 Sask.R. 8 (Q.B.), folld. [para. 38]. R. v. Phillips (D.J.) (1......