R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Citation2019 SCC 10
Date14 February 2019
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number37833
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
140 practice notes
  • R. v. T.W.W., 2024 SCC 19
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 24 Mayo 2024
    ...Newspapers Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1988] 2 S.C.R. 122; Fedeli v. Brown, 2020 ONSC 994, 60 C.P.C. (8th) 417; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; R. v. Kirkpatrick, 2022 SCC 33. By Côté and Moreau JJ. (dissenting)          &n......
  • R. v. Bertrand Marchand,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 3 Noviembre 2023
    ...v. D.B., 2013 QCCA 2199; R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62; R. v. Audet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 171; R. v. M. (M.R.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 825; R. v. Rayo, 2018 QCCA 824; R. v. Bergeron, 201......
  • R v Bertrand Marchand,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 3 Noviembre 2023
    ...v. D.B., 2013 QCCA 2199; R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62; R. v. Audet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 171; R. v. M. (M.R.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 825; R. v. Rayo, 2018 QCCA 824; R. v. Bergeron, 2016 QCC......
  • R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 2 Abril 2020
    ...2006 MBCA 91, 208 Man.R. (2d) 60; R. v. Deck, 2006 ABCA 92, 384 A.R. 106; R. v. J.A., 2011 SCC 28, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 440; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; R. v. Caron Barrette, 2018 QCCA 516, 46 C.R. (7th) 400; R. v. Iron, 2005 SKCA 84, 269 Sask.R. 51; R. v. R.W.V., 2012 BCCA 2......
  • Get Started for Free
87 cases
  • R. v. Bertrand Marchand,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 3 Noviembre 2023
    ...v. D.B., 2013 QCCA 2199; R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62; R. v. Audet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 171; R. v. M. (M.R.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 825; R. v. Rayo, 2018 QCCA 824; R. v. Bergeron, 201......
  • R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 30 Junio 2022
    ...v. Cole, 2012 SCC 53 , [2012] 3 S.C.R. 34 ; R. v. Dyment, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 417 ; Sherman Estate v. Donovan, 2021 SCC 25 ; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488 ; R. v. Edwards, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 128 ; R. v. Spencer, 2014 SCC 43 , [2014] 2 S.C.R. 212 ; R. v. Wong, [1990] 3 S.C......
  • R. v. Friesen, 2020 SCC 9
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 2 Abril 2020
    ...2006 MBCA 91, 208 Man.R. (2d) 60; R. v. Deck, 2006 ABCA 92, 384 A.R. 106; R. v. J.A., 2011 SCC 28, [2011] 2 S.C.R. 440; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; R. v. Caron Barrette, 2018 QCCA 516, 46 C.R. (7th) 400; R. v. Iron, 2005 SKCA 84, 269 Sask.R. 51; R. v. R.W.V., 2012 BCCA 2......
  • R v Bertrand Marchand,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 3 Noviembre 2023
    ...v. D.B., 2013 QCCA 2199; R. v. S.J.B., 2018 MBCA 62; R. v. Audet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 171; R. v. M. (M.R.), [1998] 3 S.C.R. 393; R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, [2019] 1 S.C.R. 488; Ross v. New Brunswick School District No. 15, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 825; R. v. Rayo, 2018 QCCA 824; R. v. Bergeron, 2016 QCC......
  • Get Started for Free
10 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 20 ' 24, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 27 Junio 2022
    ...128, R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC 67, R. v. Marakah, 2017 SCC 59, R. v. A.M., 2008 SCC 19, R. v. Plant, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 281, R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, Hunter et al. v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, Chris Hunt and Micah Rankin, "R. v. Spencer: Anonymity, the Rule of Law, and the Shrivellin......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 29 – May 3, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 28 Mayo 2019
    ...Criminal Law, Voyeurism, Distribution of Intimate Image Without Consent, Criminal Code, ss. 162(1), 191(1), 364(1) and (2), R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10, R. v. M.E.N, 2014 ONCA 69, R. v. Lebenfish, 2014 ONCJ 130 R. v. K.B., 2019 ONCA 361 [Watt, Pardu and Nordheimer JJ.A.] Counsel: I. McCuaig, ......
  • Sex, Lies & Videotape: Where Do Canadian's Have A Reasonable Expectation Of Privacy
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 3 Abril 2019
    ...tort of intrusion upon seclusion today), it represents a hopeful step forward for the protection of privacy rights in Canada. Footnotes 2019 SCC 10 [Jarvis]. S. 162(1)(c). 2015 ONSC 6813. 2017 ONCA 778. Jarvis at para 58. 2012 ONCA 32 [Tsige]. Tsige at para 43. Tsige at para 70. Tsige at pa......
  • 2019 Year In Review At The Supreme Court Of Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 1 Junio 2020
    ...law undermine the BIA's purpose. Read McCarthy Tétrault's post on Orphan Well here. Read the full decision here. 9. R. v. Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 (Ontario, criminal by right): In the Court's first opportunity to consider the elements of the crime of voyeurism, Jarvis has broad and important imp......
  • Get Started for Free
41 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Information and Privacy Law in Canada
    • 25 Junio 2020
    ...15 R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 ........................................................................................ 23 R v Jarvis, 2019 SCC 10 .................................................................23, 25, 26–30, 31 R v Johnson (1904), 8 CCC 123 (Ont SCJ) ................................
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, 2nd Edition
    • 3 Mayo 2020
    .... 389 James , R v , 2014 SCC 5 .............................................................. . 5, 419 Jarvis , R v , 2019 SCC 10 ...................................................... 63, 67, 335, 341 JAT , R v , 2010 BCSC 766 .............................................................. ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases. Third edition
    • 7 Junio 2024
    ...491 © 2024 Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. 644 Table of Cases Jarvis , R v , 2019 SCC 10 .................................................... 66, 70 JAT , R v , 2010 BCSC 766 ..................................................... 455 JAT , R v , 2013 ONSC 6320 .................
  • Reading Criminal Offences
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Sovereignty, Restraint, & Guidance. Canadian Criminal Law in the 21st Century
    • 25 Junio 2019
    ...— who did not intend to misuse 13 DLW , above note 9 at paras 17–19. On Parliament’s presumed “mastery” of the law, see R v Jarvis , 2019 SCC 10 at para 56. 14 R v Boulanger , 2006 SCC 32 . [ 89 ] [ 90 ] Sovereignty, reStraint, and guidance his office for personal gain or other corrupt pur......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT