R v JAW, 2020 MBCA 62
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | Madam Justice Freda M. Steel,Madam Justice Diana M. Cameron,Madam Justice Jennifer A. Pfuetzner |
| Citation | 2020 MBCA 62 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Docket Number | AR19-30-09332 |
| Date | 10 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v Bunn,
...the sexual assault. At the sentencing hearing, the Crown argued that the facts of this case were similar to those in R v JAW, 2020 MBCA 62. In that case, the accused’s appeal of a sentence of 39 months’ imprisonment was dismissed in circumstances where the accused ......
-
R. v. Bunn,
...clear on the evidence. The facts in this case are somewhat different than the facts in the Manitoba Court of Appeal case of R. v. J.A.W., 2020 MBCA 62, relied upon by the Crown. In that case, the accused knew the complainant well; knew that she had a boyfriend; knew that she was in a vulner......
-
R v DT, 2020 MBCA 88
...an essential part in the reasoning process resulting in the conviction (see R v Morrissey (1995), 97 CCC (3d) 193 (Ont CA); and R v JAW, 2020 MBCA 62). [9] In summarising the evidence in her reasons, the trial judge incorrectly referred to the internal injury as a five-centimetre rather tha......
3 cases
-
R v Bunn,
...the sexual assault. At the sentencing hearing, the Crown argued that the facts of this case were similar to those in R v JAW, 2020 MBCA 62. In that case, the accused’s appeal of a sentence of 39 months’ imprisonment was dismissed in circumstances where the accused ......
-
R. v. Bunn,
...clear on the evidence. The facts in this case are somewhat different than the facts in the Manitoba Court of Appeal case of R. v. J.A.W., 2020 MBCA 62, relied upon by the Crown. In that case, the accused knew the complainant well; knew that she had a boyfriend; knew that she was in a vulner......
-
R v DT, 2020 MBCA 88
...an essential part in the reasoning process resulting in the conviction (see R v Morrissey (1995), 97 CCC (3d) 193 (Ont CA); and R v JAW, 2020 MBCA 62). [9] In summarising the evidence in her reasons, the trial judge incorrectly referred to the internal injury as a five-centimetre rather tha......