R. v. JED

JurisdictionManitoba
CourtCourt of Appeal (Manitoba)
JudgeFreda M. Steel,Christopher J. Mainella,Janice L. leMaistre
Citation2018 MBCA 123
Date22 November 2018
Docket NumberAR17-30-08926

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
48 practice notes
  • Sentencing
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2020
    ...as unconstitutional. See e.g. R v BJT , 2019 ONCA 694 ; Caron Barrette c R , 2018 QCCA 516 ; R v Hood , 2018 NSCA 18 ; R v JED , 2018 MBCA 123 ; R v Scoield , 2019 BCCA 3 ; R v Ford , 2017 ABQB 322 ; R v SJP , 2016 NSPC 50 ; R v Sarmales , 2017 ONSC 1869 ; R v ML , 2016 ONSC 7082. 10 Crimin......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2020
    .... 182 JEB , R v , 2014 ONSC 1921 ............................................................. 476 JED , R v , 2018 MBCA 123 ............................................................. . 473 Jensen , R v , (1996), 106 CCC (3d) 430, 47 CR (4th) 363 (Ont CA), af ’d [1997] 1 SCR 304, 112 CCC......
  • Sentencing
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases. Third edition
    • June 7, 2024
    ...minimum sentence for sexual interference as unconstitutional. See e.g. R v Scoield , 2019 BCCA 3 ; R v BJT , 2019 ONCA 694 ; R v JED , 2018 MBCA 123 ; Caron Barrette c R , 2018 QCCA 516 ; R v Hood , 2018 NSCA 18 ; and R v Ford , 2019 ABCA 87 for cases prosecuted by indictment; and R v DAD ,......
  • Sexual Offences
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases. Third edition
    • June 7, 2024
    ...down the mandatory minimum sentence for sexual interference as being unconstitutional. See e.g. R v BJT , 2019 ONCA 694 ; R v JED , 2018 MBCA 123 ; Caron Barrette c R , 2018 QCCA 516 ; R v Hood , 2018 NSCA 18 ; R v Scoield , 2019 BCCA 3; and R v Ford , 2019 ABCA 87 for cases prosecuted by i......
  • Get Started for Free
37 cases
  • R v R.D.F.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 31, 2019
    ...widely cited with approval, including in Chol at paragraph 57; R v Plein, 2018 ONCA 748 at para 83, 365 CCC (3d) 437 [Plein]; R v J.E.D., 2018 MBCA 123 at para 70, 368 CCC (3d) 212 [J.E.D.]; and R v Scofield, 2019 BCCA 3 at paras 45 and 104, 52 CR (7th) 379 [Scofield]. [217] As noted, Maine......
  • Her Majesty the Queen v. Pond,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (New Brunswick)
    • August 13, 2020
    ...d’un délinquant sont, en soi, un facteur atténuant ou signifient que la culpabilité morale de ce dernier est diminuée (R. c. J.E.D., 2018 MBCA 123, [2018] M.J. No. 304 (QL), par. [45] En l’espèce, la défense s’est appuyée sur les décisions de notre Cour dans Schriver, Murdoch et Parker pour......
  • R v Reeves, 2020 ABQB 78
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 30, 2020
    ..."touch" for a sexual purpose. My conclusion comports with the recent decisions of other appellate courts: R v Hood, 2018 NSCA 18, R v JED 2018 MBCA 123, and 19 A final observation. I am aware that this decision is at odds with R v EJB, 2018 ABCA 239, which considered the constitutionality o......
  • R v EF, 2021 ABQB 639
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 13, 2021
    ...of imprisonment for a term of 2 years less a day, but noted it was at the bottom end of the appropriate range. [83] In R v JED, 2018 MBCA 123, the Manitoba Court of Appeal reviewed numerous authorities and concluded, in a pre-Friesen decision, as follows (at para 66): These cases appear to ......
  • Get Started for Free
11 books & journal articles
  • Sentencing
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2020
    ...as unconstitutional. See e.g. R v BJT , 2019 ONCA 694 ; Caron Barrette c R , 2018 QCCA 516 ; R v Hood , 2018 NSCA 18 ; R v JED , 2018 MBCA 123 ; R v Scoield , 2019 BCCA 3 ; R v Ford , 2017 ABQB 322 ; R v SJP , 2016 NSPC 50 ; R v Sarmales , 2017 ONSC 1869 ; R v ML , 2016 ONSC 7082. 10 Crimin......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2020
    .... 182 JEB , R v , 2014 ONSC 1921 ............................................................. 476 JED , R v , 2018 MBCA 123 ............................................................. . 473 Jensen , R v , (1996), 106 CCC (3d) 430, 47 CR (4th) 363 (Ont CA), af ’d [1997] 1 SCR 304, 112 CCC......
  • Sentencing
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases. Third edition
    • June 7, 2024
    ...minimum sentence for sexual interference as unconstitutional. See e.g. R v Scoield , 2019 BCCA 3 ; R v BJT , 2019 ONCA 694 ; R v JED , 2018 MBCA 123 ; Caron Barrette c R , 2018 QCCA 516 ; R v Hood , 2018 NSCA 18 ; and R v Ford , 2019 ABCA 87 for cases prosecuted by indictment; and R v DAD ,......
  • Sexual Offences
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Sexual Offence Cases. Third edition
    • June 7, 2024
    ...down the mandatory minimum sentence for sexual interference as being unconstitutional. See e.g. R v BJT , 2019 ONCA 694 ; R v JED , 2018 MBCA 123 ; Caron Barrette c R , 2018 QCCA 516 ; R v Hood , 2018 NSCA 18 ; R v Scoield , 2019 BCCA 3; and R v Ford , 2019 ABCA 87 for cases prosecuted by i......
  • Get Started for Free